Volkskas Bpk v Johnson

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeGrosskopf R
Judgment Date30 August 1979
Citation1979 (4) SA 775 (C)
Hearing Date09 August 1979
CourtCape Provincial Division

Grosskopf R:

B Die feite in hierdie saak word uiteengesit in 'n gestelde saak ingevolge Hofreël 33 en val binne 'n klein bestek. Die eiser, 'n handelsbank, eis van sy kliënt, die verweerder, 'n bedrag van R3 357, 95 wat na bewering verskuldig is op die verweer se oortrokke bankrekening. Die debietbalans op die verweerder se rekening het ontstaan deurdat die eiser 'n tjek vir R3 600 wat op 15 Julie 1977 deur die verweerder getrek C was, uitbetaal het en die verweerder se rekening met die bedrag daarvan gedebiteer het. Die vraag vir beslissing is of die eiser geregtig was om dit te doen, en in besonder of die tjek oordraagbaar was aan die persoon aan wie betaling geskied het.

Die tjek is in 'n gewone gedrukte vorm met die gedrukte woorde:


"Betaal

of toonder

Pay

or bearer".


In die oop spasie na die woorde "Betaal/Pay" het die verweerder in ink die woorde "Tennant & Co (a/c I Abrahams)" ingeskryf. Hy het die gedrukte woorde "toonder" en "bearer" deurgehaal en bo hulle "only" ingeskryf in duidelike drukletters. Hoewel die woord "of" voor "toonder" en "or" voor E "bearer" nie deurgehaal is nie, het hulle geen sin in die aanduiding van die persoon aan wie betaal moet word nie, en kan hulle buite rekening gelaat word (soos trouens gedoen is in para 2 van die gestelde saak). Die betrokke reël in die tjek lees dan as volg (ek gebruik net die Engelse woorde wat op die gedrukte vorm verskyn):

"Pay Tennant & Co (a/c I Abrahams) only".

Op die voorkant van die tjek verskyn daar 'n kruising wat met 'n stempel aangebring is. Dit bestaan uit twee parallelle dwarslyne met die woorde "not negotiable" daartussen.

Gemelde Tennant & Co het die tjek geëndosseer met die woorde: "Pay to I G Abrahams without recourse to us - Tennant & Co". Die I Abrahams aan wie die tjek geëndosseer is, is dieselfde persoon na wie verwys word deur die woorde "a/c I Abrahams" op die voorkant van die tjek.

Gemelde I Abrahams het, volgens die gestelde saak, die tjek geëndosseer aan ene Sonia Feinberg. Die oorspronklike tjek, wat met ooreenkoms ingehandig is, toon dat Abrahams 'n blanko endossement aangebring het. Hoe H dit ook al sy, die tjek is uiteindelik agterop geteken namens Sonia Feinberg, en in haar bankrekening by Barclays Nasionale Bank inbetaal. Die eiser het die bedrag van R3 600 aan Barclays Nasionale Bank betaal en die verweerder se lopende bankrekening met hierdie bedrag gedebiteer. Dit is gemene saak dat die eiser nie onder enige wanindruk kon gewees het dat Barclays Nasionale Bank die geld namens Tennant & Co invorder nie.

Die verhouding tussen bankier en kliënt behels dat die bankier sy kliënt se opdrag om te betaal, soos...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 practice notes
  • The Cloning of Credit Cards: The Dolly of the Electronic Era
    • South Africa
    • Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...and P romissory Notes in S outh Afric an Law pars 203 206 . With regard to cheques specif ically, it was sai d in Volkskas Bp k v Johnson 1979 4 SA 775 (C) 777-778 that the bank is oblig ed to pay according t o its tenor and only on ce this is done will t he bank be entitled to debit its cl......
  • DI Giulio v First National Bank of South Africa Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...dicta at 530G - H and 531F - H applied Totalisator Agency Board, OFS v Livanos 1987 (3) SA 283 (W): referred to Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C): dictum at 777H - 778A Watts v Shuttleworth (1861) 7 H & N 235 (157 ER 1171 (Exch)): referred to. D Case Information Appeal from a decis......
  • Worcester Advice Office v First National Bank of Southern Africa Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Sham Magazine Centre 1977 (1) SA 484 (A); Aboobaker v Gableite Distributors E (Pty) Ltd 1978 (4) SA 615 (D); Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C); Gishen v Nedbank Ltd 1984 (2) SA 378 (W); Impala Plastics (Pty) Ltd v Coetzer 1984 (2) SA 392 If a cheque bears both markings, it is not......
  • Analyses: Liability of Drawee Bank in Respect of Cheques Altered Without Authority
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...in an individual cheque, the mandatary is entitled to be compensated and reimbursed by the mandator (see Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C) at 777H-778A). 3 Forgery of the Drawer's Signature Where the signature of the drawer on a cheque is forged, the drawee bank normally pays the c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • DI Giulio v First National Bank of South Africa Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...dicta at 530G - H and 531F - H applied Totalisator Agency Board, OFS v Livanos 1987 (3) SA 283 (W): referred to Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C): dictum at 777H - 778A Watts v Shuttleworth (1861) 7 H & N 235 (157 ER 1171 (Exch)): referred to. D Case Information Appeal from a decis......
  • Worcester Advice Office v First National Bank of Southern Africa Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Sham Magazine Centre 1977 (1) SA 484 (A); Aboobaker v Gableite Distributors E (Pty) Ltd 1978 (4) SA 615 (D); Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C); Gishen v Nedbank Ltd 1984 (2) SA 378 (W); Impala Plastics (Pty) Ltd v Coetzer 1984 (2) SA 392 If a cheque bears both markings, it is not......
  • B & H Engineering v First National Bank of SA Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...[1974] 1 NZLR 118; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Anker Electronic Motor and Equipment Co Ltd 93 DLR (3d) 510; I Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C); Wynland Construction (Pty) Ltd v Ashley-Smith en Andere 1985 (3) SA 798 (A). J Canaris Bankvertragsrecht Teil I paras 705 and 739; 1995 (2) S......
  • Worcester Advice Office v First National Bank of Southern Africa Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Cape Provincial Division
    • 10 September 1990
    ...v Sham Magazine Centre 1977 (1) SA 484 (A); Aboobaker v Gableite Distributors E (Pty) Ltd 1978 (4) SA 615 (D); Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C); Gishen v Nedbank Ltd 1984 (2) SA 378 (W); Impala Plastics (Pty) Ltd v Coetzer 1984 (2) SA 392 If a cheque bears both markings, it is not......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • The Cloning of Credit Cards: The Dolly of the Electronic Era
    • South Africa
    • Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...and P romissory Notes in S outh Afric an Law pars 203 206 . With regard to cheques specif ically, it was sai d in Volkskas Bp k v Johnson 1979 4 SA 775 (C) 777-778 that the bank is oblig ed to pay according t o its tenor and only on ce this is done will t he bank be entitled to debit its cl......
  • Analyses: Liability of Drawee Bank in Respect of Cheques Altered Without Authority
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...in an individual cheque, the mandatary is entitled to be compensated and reimbursed by the mandator (see Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C) at 777H-778A). 3 Forgery of the Drawer's Signature Where the signature of the drawer on a cheque is forged, the drawee bank normally pays the c......
  • Analyses: Altered cheques and the collecting bank
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...in an individual cheque, the mandatary is entitled to be compensated and reimbursed by the mandator. In Volkskas Bpk v Johnson (1979 (4) SA 775 (C) at 777-778) Grosskopf J explained as follows: 'Die verhouding tussen bankier en kliënt behels dat die bankier sy kliënt se opdrag om te betaal,......
  • Analyses: Aspects of the collection of a cheque cleared through an automated clearing bureau
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...Company Limited (1894) 1 OR 24 at 27; OK Bazaars ( 1929) Ltd v Universal Stores Ltd 1973 (2) SA 281 (C) at 288; Volkskas Bpk v Johnson 1979 (4) SA 775 (C) at 777-778; Harold Luntz 'Cheques as Mandates and as Bills' (1997) 12 Banking and Financial LR 189 at 190; Malan Bills para 203; FR Mala......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT