Analyses: Liability of Drawee Bank in Respect of Cheques Altered Without Authority

JurisdictionSouth Africa
AuthorJT Pretorius
Published date25 May 2019
Date25 May 2019
Citation(1999) 11 SA Merc LJ 390
Pages390-399
390
(1999) 11 SA Merc LJ
Liability of Drawee Bank in Respect of
Cheques Altered Without Authority
JT PRETORIUS
University of South Africa
1 Introduction
In recent years there has been a spate of cheque frauds and thefts where
the thieves intercept cheques in the post. To get their hands on the
proceeds of the cheques, the cheats alter the original order of the drawer
and substitute, alter, or add to the name of the original payee. In many
instances there is also an increase in the amount for which the cheque was
originally drawn in order to make the enterprise more lucrative. The
cheque is then paid into a bank account that has been opened some time
before and that has been kept on ice for the right occasion. What is
particularly disturbing for the banking industry, is that the criminals
are getting more sophisticated and that the alterations to cheques are
sometimes so skillfully done that it is not possible to detect it by an
ordinary examination of the cheque in question. In
Momentum Life
Assurers Ltd v First National Futures (Pty) Ltd
(1995
Commercial Law
Digest
458 (W)) the Court was dealing with such an alteration and the
judge remarked (at 461) that he had 'carefully studied the cheque . . . and
even with the aid of a magnifying glass was unable to discern the
obliteration of the original or the removal of the original payee's name
from the cheque'. In other words, it is quite possible with modern
technology that the alteration on the cheque would be 'perfect' so that it
would not be 'obvious' or even 'apparent' from the document itself.
The question to be considered in this analysis is where the loss should
fall in the event of a fraudulent 'perfect' alteration of a cheque. I have
previously dealt with certain aspects of the alteration of cheques (see
JT
Pretorius 'Altered Cheques and the Collecting Bank' (1997) 9
SA Merc
LJ
365 (Pretorius 'Altered Cheques')). The purpose of that contribution
was to set out in general terms the legal position between the
drawee bank
and the
collecting bank
in the event of an unauthorised alteration of a
cheque. In this contribution I will attempt to highlight and further explain
and examine some of the views I put forward there, but I will at the same
time focus specifically on the legal position of the drawee bank in the event
of an unauthorised alteration of the cheque.
2 The Bank and Customer Relationship
The starting point is the basic principles of our law. The relationship
between a customer and his bank is contractual in nature (see FR Malan
& JT
Pretorius 'Enrichment in Triangular Situations, Interest and the
In Duplum Rule, and Personal Liability and Company Names' (1996)
(1999) 11 SA Merc LJ 390
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT