Understanding the Constitution of India and positive discrimination

AuthorTameshnie Deane
DOI10.10520/EJC153211
Pages157-176
Published date01 January 2011
Date01 January 2011
Understanding the Constitution of India
and positive discrimination
Tameshnie Deane
*
1Overview
India is a democratic country facing the not so unique challenge of achieving
equality in the form of special provisions for all of its citizens.
1
Special provisions
are those steps taken by the Indian government for certain classes of the Indian
population in order to reach the goal of social equality as laid down by the
Constitution of India.
2
The goals of social justice and equality refer particularly to
the standing of ‘Scheduled Castes’, the ‘Scheduled Tribes’ and to a limited extent,
‘the Other Backward Classes’.
3
However, the term ‘equality’ needs to be defined
in this context. ‘Equality before the law’ is not the same as ‘equal protection of the
law’.
4
It is the latter, more positive concept that is upheld by the Constitution of
India in the achievement of equality for all of its citizens.
5
In India, the focus area
of such measures ranges from employment in the public sector to the reservation
of seats in government and education. The inducement towards affirmative action
has a dual purpose. Firstly it aims to maximise diversity at all levels in society, and
*
BProc (University of Natal Durban), LLB (University of Natal Durban), LLD (UNISA). Associate
Professor, Criminal and Procedural Law, College of Law.
1
For example, even a developed democracy like the United States of America is no exception and
has implemented affirmative action policies to deal with the issue. South Africa too faces the
challenge of harmonising a country damaged by the outcomes of apartheid and ensuring that justice
is served for the less privileged sections of the society at the cost of individual merit and the equality
of all citizens before the law.
2
The Constitution of the Republic of India of 1950 is the world’s lengthiest written constitution (with
395 articles and 8 schedules) and was passed on 1949-11-26. It has been in effect since 1950-01-
26. The Directive Principles of the Constitution underline that ‘the State shall promote with special
care the educational and economic interest of the scheduled castes/tribes and shall protect them
from social injustice and all forms of exploitation’.
3
Article 46 of the Constitution of India obligates the state to promote with special care the educational
and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, in particular, of the scheduled castes
and scheduled tribes.
4
Article 14 of The Constitution of India guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the law.
5
Article 16(1) and 16(2) of the Constitution guarantees equality of opportunity.
(2011) 26 SAPL158
secondly to redress disadvantages due to discriminatory practices. The principle
of equality in this sense refers to attempts to create equal opportunities for
persons who have been previously disadvantaged. Positive measures therefore
seek to ensure greater equality of opportunity,
6
and this aim implies that the needs
of these different groups of people often necessitate different treatment, ultimately
leading to the realisation of socio-economic equality among all citizens of India.
7
This article looks at the Republic of India’s version of what is referred to as
‘affirmative action’ in South African legal parlance. It attempts to give the reader
an understanding of the functioning and challenges of affirmative action and the
difficulties in the implementation of the Indian Constitution’s affirmative action
programmes. It also highlights some of the many problems faced by the Indian
courts and to give readers with similar agendas an overview of the advantages
and disadvantages of a programme that has already been implemented. The
reason for looking at the Indian system of affirmative action is that the Indian
system of positive discrimination has now been in place for over fifty years. Any
democratic constituency that is implementing such a programme can only benefit
by drawing upon India’s methods and wealth of experience with regard to the
implementation of affirmative action programmes in the form of reservations.
8
2 Caste discrimination
For centuries, India’s people have experienced social discrimination based on the
institution called the ‘caste system’.
9
Each caste is historically linked to an occupation
and represents a strict social hierarchy of status into which people are born and can
never change their caste identity.
10
Therefore, caste is inherited and sanctioned by
6
Edwards When race counts: The morality of racial preference in Britain and America (1995) 29.
7
Deshpande Affirmative action in India and the United States world development report (2006).
8
Reservation is a form of affirmative action whereby a percentage of seats are reserved in the public
sector, union and state civil services, union and state government departments and in all public and
private educational institutions, except in the religious/ linguistic minority educational institutions, for
the socially and educationally disadvantaged communities and the Scheduled Castes and Tribes.
The reservation policy is also extended to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for
representation in the Parliament of India. The central government of India reserves 27% of higher
education seats for the socially and educationally disadvantaged. Individual states have the power
to legislate further reservations. Reservation in most states is at 50%, which is the maximum amount
declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. De Zwart ‘The logic of affirmative action: Caste, class
and quotas in India’ Acta Sociologica (2000) 43 at 235.
9
Many castes are traditionally associated with an occupation, such as high-ranking Brahmans;
middle-ranking farmer and artisan groups, such as potters, barbers, and carpenters; and very low-
ranking ‘untouchable’ leatherworkers, butchers, launderers, and latrine cleaners. There is some
correlation between ritual rank in the caste hierarchy and economic prosperity. Members of higher-
ranking castes tend, on the whole, to be more prosperous than members of lower-ranking castes.
Many lower-caste people live in conditions of great poverty and social disadvantage. Heitzman and
Worden (eds) India – A country study (1995).
10
At the top of the caste system are the Brahmins, who are the priests and arbiters of what is right
and wrong in matters of religion and society. Next are the Kshatriyas, who are soldiers and

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT