The way in which a partnership is terminated by conduct. Chapter 36

Pages233-235
Published date01 February 2006
Date01 February 2006
DOI10.10520/EJC74047
Chapter 36
The way in which a partnership is terminated by
conduct
Summary
1. A partnership is terminated by conduct, which includes contract
and court action — contract would mean novation.
2. Court action means to proceed against somebody appointed by
my partner or to proceed against the partner himself by an action
based on partnership.
3. If the actio pro socio is brought to claim something which had to
be observed while one partnership was still in existence, the partner-
ship is not dissolved (& num. 4).
5. If the general actio pro socio is brought against a co-partner, the
partnership is dissolved.
6. Partners cannot be opponents.
7. Once an action is instituted, the partnership is dissolved simul-
taneously.
8. The issuers of lease may be compelled to enter into a new lease,
if there is a very large income and nobody can be abstained in
leasing for the same price, but only those willing to lease it for less.
This is correct but it is never observed.
A partnership is dissolved when court proceedings are instituted
by one partner against the other (l. verum. ss. fin.ff. pro soc.) and
that means that the partnership’s nature is changed by contract or
by court proceedings (l. actione. in princ. ff. pro soc.). A contract in
this regard means that it was entered into with a co-partner or an
extraneous person (Petr. de bald. in tract. de duob.fratr ib. part. 11.
sub num. 1. vers. octavo.), with novation in mind (gloss. in ver. stipu-
latione). Court proceedings may assume two forms. Firstly, by insti-
tuting action against the appointee of my co-partner (l. delegare. ff.
de novat. & delegat.Gloss. in d. l. actione. in princip. in ver. judicio.
Petrus de Ubald. d. part. 11. sub num. 1. vers. octavo). Secondly, by
instituting the actio pro socio against the partner himself with the
clear understanding that there is a difference between a partnership
for the lease of taxes and an ordinary partnership. In the former
the bringing of the actio pro socio will not result in the dissolution
of the partnership, because the partners may be compelled to proceed
so as not to cause a loan to the treasury.This view is substantiated
(in l. actione. ss. nonnunquam. ff. pro soc) to the effect that it is
sometimes necessary to institute an action against a co-partner
233

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT