Rex v Dunga

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeWessels CJ, Curlewis JA, Stratford JA and De Villiers JA
Judgment Date20 December 1933
Citation1934 AD 223
Hearing Date20 December 1933
CourtAppellate Division

Stratford, J.A.:

This matter comes before us on a special entry made under sec. 370 of the Criminal Code for the consideration of this Court. The appellant was tried on a charge of murder before GANE, A.J., sitting without a jury, but assisted by two assessors. He was convicted and sentenced to death. Subsequently the following order was made: "It is ordered that a special entry be made under sec. 370 of Act 31 of 1917, for the consideration of the Court of Appeal, on the ground that the proceedings in his trial on the charge of murder, of which he was convicted on the 30th, September, 1933, at the Umtata Circuit Court by the acting Judge and two assessors, were irregular and illegal in that: (1) when the Crown tendered in evidence through the witness Francis Joseph Smith, the confession or statement (R.S.C. 1) made by the applicant on the 30th January, 1933, the learned acting Judge presiding, refused to try the issue of admissibility of the said confession or statement separately from the issue of guilt, and (2) that the said confession or statement was received in evidence without due legal opportunity having been given to the defence to contest its admissibility."

The statement referred to was put in by the Crown through the assistant magistrate of Libode. It is conceded by counsel for the appellant that this statement did not amount to a confession and that...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
49 practice notes
  • S v Khuzwayo
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 29 March 1990
    ...die vraag of 'n bekentenis vrywilliglik gemaak is ter sprake is, kruisverhoor te rig op die materiële inhoud van die bekentenis: R v Dunga 1934 AD 223; R v Meer and Others 1958 (1) SA 243 (N) op 244E-G; R v Hammond [1941] 3 All ER 318 (CCA); S v Lebone 1965 (2) SA 837 (A) op D 842A-B; S v A......
  • Rex v Linder and Others
    • South Africa
    • South African Appellate Division Reports
    • 5 June 1945
    ...and the cases thereon; Rex v Louw (1918 AD 344); Rex v Essa (1922 AD 241); Rex v Nafte (1929 T.P.D. 477); Rex v Dunga (1934, E.D.L. 56; 1934 AD 223). As to what amounts to undue influence in the making of a confession, see Rex v Xinti (1943, E.D.L. 42, P.-H. H. 200); Rex v Nchabeleng (1941 ......
  • S v Panayiotou
    • South Africa
    • Eastern Cape Division
    • 2 November 2017
    ...of voluntariness without being exposed to general cross-examination on the issue of his guilt. 2017 JDR 1739 p19 Chetty J (See R v Dunga 1934 AD 223 at 226.) The prosecution may not, as part of its case on the main issue, lead evidence regarding the testimony given by the defendant at the t......
  • S v De Vries
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 28 September 1988
    ...the witness-box on the issue of voluntariness without being exposed to general cross-examination on the issue of his guilt. (See R v Dunga 1934 AD 223 at 226.) The prosecution may not, J as part of its case on the main issue, lead evidence 1989 (1) SA p234 Nicholas AJA A regarding the testi......
  • Get Started for Free
49 cases
  • S v Khuzwayo
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 29 March 1990
    ...die vraag of 'n bekentenis vrywilliglik gemaak is ter sprake is, kruisverhoor te rig op die materiële inhoud van die bekentenis: R v Dunga 1934 AD 223; R v Meer and Others 1958 (1) SA 243 (N) op 244E-G; R v Hammond [1941] 3 All ER 318 (CCA); S v Lebone 1965 (2) SA 837 (A) op D 842A-B; S v A......
  • Rex v Linder and Others
    • South Africa
    • South African Appellate Division Reports
    • 5 June 1945
    ...and the cases thereon; Rex v Louw (1918 AD 344); Rex v Essa (1922 AD 241); Rex v Nafte (1929 T.P.D. 477); Rex v Dunga (1934, E.D.L. 56; 1934 AD 223). As to what amounts to undue influence in the making of a confession, see Rex v Xinti (1943, E.D.L. 42, P.-H. H. 200); Rex v Nchabeleng (1941 ......
  • S v Panayiotou
    • South Africa
    • Eastern Cape Division
    • 2 November 2017
    ...of voluntariness without being exposed to general cross-examination on the issue of his guilt. 2017 JDR 1739 p19 Chetty J (See R v Dunga 1934 AD 223 at 226.) The prosecution may not, as part of its case on the main issue, lead evidence regarding the testimony given by the defendant at the t......
  • S v De Vries
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 28 September 1988
    ...the witness-box on the issue of voluntariness without being exposed to general cross-examination on the issue of his guilt. (See R v Dunga 1934 AD 223 at 226.) The prosecution may not, J as part of its case on the main issue, lead evidence 1989 (1) SA p234 Nicholas AJA A regarding the testi......
  • Get Started for Free