Recent Case: Sentencing

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Pages428-434
Date24 May 2019
Published date24 May 2019
Citation(2001) 14 SACJ 428
AuthorJames Lund
428
SACJ •
(2001) 14 •
SAS
Sentencing
JAMES LUND
University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg
General Aspects
Appeal
S v Van Aswegen
2001 (2) SACR 97 (SCA) reaffirms the rule that a court of
appeal is not empowered to impose a sentence that exceeds the penal
jurisdiction of the trial court. In casu a magistrate had sentenced a robber to
twelve months' imprisonment, of which four months was suspended. On
appeal, the Provincial Division had increased the sentence to four years'
imprisonment (subject to the provisions of s 276(1)(z) of the Criminal
Procedure Act 1977). This was set aside in a further appeal since the
magistrate's jurisdiction was at the time restricted to twelve months'
imprisonment. But the case was then remitted to a regional court for
sentence, because the Supreme Court of Appeal agreed that the original
(magistrate's) sentence was wholly inadequate for a robbery in which the
appellant and two accomplices had punched and kicked the complainant,
drawing blood and requiring medical treatment, and had robbed him of
R1 500.
Review: sentence incapable of execution
In
S v M
2001 (2) SACR 316 (D it was held even though a committal to a
reform school had already been confirmed on review, that committal could
be set aside in a further review when it emerged that there were no reform
schools for girls in South Africa so that the order could not be carried out. The
case was remitted to the magistrate for imposition of a different sentence.
Minimum sentences: ss 51-3 of the Criminal Law Amendment
Act 105 of 1997
Schedule 2 offences
In
S v Gqamana
2001 (2) SA 28 (C) Thring J found that there were substantial
and compelling circumstances justifying the imposition of a sentence of ten
years' imprisonment (reduced to eight years to take account of time spent in
custody awaiting trial and sentence) rather than the minimum of life
imprisonment prescribed by the Act in a case of rape of a girl under the age
of sixteen years. (Although decided prior to
S v Malgas
(2001) 14 SACJ 428
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT