Your World of Legal Intelligence
 South Africa | 1-800-335-6202

Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd

Judgment South Africa Law Reports Cited authorities 2 Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1985 (2) SA 116 (N)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Jurgens Eiendomsagente v Share
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...an exigible part of it', naamlik 'an obligation with a corresponding right'. (Vgl ook Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N) te 117I.) Sowel die 'term' as die 'condition' is bepalings of 'provisions' van die ooreenkoms. Waar H die bepaling die werking van 'n be......
  • Bryer and Others NNO v Teabosa CC t/a Simon Chuter Properties and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...were unreasonably withholding their consent (see Thomas v Curnow 1913 WLD 168 and Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N)), submitted that the onus was on the respondents to show that the applicants' refusal of consent was unreasonable and that respondents had n......
  • Coetzee v Attorney's Insurance Indemnity Fund
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...E Hawkins v Gathercole (1855) LJ 24 CH 332 Hira v Booysen 1992 (4) SA 69 (A) at 79 Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N) at Mphosi v Central Board for Co-operative Insurance 1974 (4) SA 633 (A) at 645 F Pryzbylak v Santam Insurance Ltd 1992 (1) SA 588 (C) at 6......
  • South African National Defence Union v Minister of Defence and Others
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 4 Junio 2004
    ...Dibdin was also applied to the interpretation of a proviso in an agreement of lease in Locke v Centracom Property Investments Pty Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N) at 7.12 Accordingly, the proviso to clause 43 does not afford the national secretary a mandate in the instant case to bring the applicati......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Jurgens Eiendomsagente v Share
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...an exigible part of it', naamlik 'an obligation with a corresponding right'. (Vgl ook Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N) te 117I.) Sowel die 'term' as die 'condition' is bepalings of 'provisions' van die ooreenkoms. Waar H die bepaling die werking van 'n be......
  • Bryer and Others NNO v Teabosa CC t/a Simon Chuter Properties and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...were unreasonably withholding their consent (see Thomas v Curnow 1913 WLD 168 and Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N)), submitted that the onus was on the respondents to show that the applicants' refusal of consent was unreasonable and that respondents had n......
  • Coetzee v Attorney's Insurance Indemnity Fund
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...E Hawkins v Gathercole (1855) LJ 24 CH 332 Hira v Booysen 1992 (4) SA 69 (A) at 79 Locke v Centracom Property Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N) at Mphosi v Central Board for Co-operative Insurance 1974 (4) SA 633 (A) at 645 F Pryzbylak v Santam Insurance Ltd 1992 (1) SA 588 (C) at 6......
  • South African National Defence Union v Minister of Defence and Others
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 4 Junio 2004
    ...Dibdin was also applied to the interpretation of a proviso in an agreement of lease in Locke v Centracom Property Investments Pty Ltd 1985 (2) SA 116 (N) at 7.12 Accordingly, the proviso to clause 43 does not afford the national secretary a mandate in the instant case to bring the applicati......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT