Hindry v Nedcor Bank Ltd and Another

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeWunsh J
Judgment Date02 December 1998
Citation1999 (2) SA 757 (W)
Docket Number7141/97
Hearing Date19 November 1998
CounselT Massyn for the applicant No appearance for the first respondent JI Du Toit for the secon respondent
CourtWitwatersrand Local Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service, and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...dictum at 341I - J applied Hicklin v Secretary for Inland Revenue 1980 (1) SA 481 (A): considered Hindry v Necor Bank Ltd and Another 1999 (2) SA 757 (W) (1999 (4) JTLR 77): referred to I Income Tax Case 1470 52 SATC 88: referred to Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co v Johannesburg Tow......
  • Chief Lesapo v North West Agricultural Bank and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Vryenhoek and Others v Powell NO and Others 1996 (1) SA 984 (CC) (1996 (1) BCLR 1): referred to I Hindry v Nedcor Bank Ltd and Another 1999 (2) SA 757 (W): distinguished Ixopo Irrigation Board v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa 1991 (3) SA 233 (N): considered Johannesburg City Cou......
  • First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Hewlett v Minister of Finance and Another 1982 (1) SA 490 (ZS): dictum at 506D - E applied C Hindry v Nedcor Bank Ltd and Another 1999 (2) SA 757 (W) (1999 (4) JTLR 77): referred McKesson Corporation v Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Department of Business Regulation of Florida......
  • Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service, and Another
    • South Africa
    • Constitutional Court
    • 24 November 2000
    ...n 6 at 242C - F. [36] Above n 9. [37] Above n 6 at 242I - 243A. [38] Above n 6 at 243G - H. [39] Id at 244B. [40] Id at 244E - G. [41] 1999 (2) SA 757 (W) (1999 (4) JTLR 77), a judgment of a single Judge sitting in the same High [42] Section 99 of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. [43] The imp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service, and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...dictum at 341I - J applied Hicklin v Secretary for Inland Revenue 1980 (1) SA 481 (A): considered Hindry v Necor Bank Ltd and Another 1999 (2) SA 757 (W) (1999 (4) JTLR 77): referred to I Income Tax Case 1470 52 SATC 88: referred to Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co v Johannesburg Tow......
  • Chief Lesapo v North West Agricultural Bank and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Vryenhoek and Others v Powell NO and Others 1996 (1) SA 984 (CC) (1996 (1) BCLR 1): referred to I Hindry v Nedcor Bank Ltd and Another 1999 (2) SA 757 (W): distinguished Ixopo Irrigation Board v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa 1991 (3) SA 233 (N): considered Johannesburg City Cou......
  • First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Hewlett v Minister of Finance and Another 1982 (1) SA 490 (ZS): dictum at 506D - E applied C Hindry v Nedcor Bank Ltd and Another 1999 (2) SA 757 (W) (1999 (4) JTLR 77): referred McKesson Corporation v Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Department of Business Regulation of Florida......
  • Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service, and Another
    • South Africa
    • Constitutional Court
    • 24 November 2000
    ...n 6 at 242C - F. [36] Above n 9. [37] Above n 6 at 242I - 243A. [38] Above n 6 at 243G - H. [39] Id at 244B. [40] Id at 244E - G. [41] 1999 (2) SA 757 (W) (1999 (4) JTLR 77), a judgment of a single Judge sitting in the same High [42] Section 99 of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. [43] The imp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • 2021 volume 1 p 136
    • South Africa
    • Tydskrif van Suid Afrikaanse Reg No. , July 2021
    • 22 July 2021
    ...and is t herefore not unconstit utional” (Leg waila et al Tax Law An Introduction (2020) 478; see also Hind ry v Nedcor Bank Ltd 1999 2 SA 757 (W); Keulde r and Legwaila “The const itutionality of third par ty appointment s – before and after the Tax Admi nistration Act” 2014 THRHR 53-7 1).......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT