Ex parte Graaff-Reinet Rollermeule (Edms) Bpk
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Leach J |
| Judgment Date | 21 June 2000 |
| Docket Number | 679/2000 |
| Hearing Date | 15 June 2000 |
| Counsel | T J M Patterson for the applicant. |
| Court | Eastern Cape Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Ex parte New Seasons Auto Holdings (Pty) Ltd
...the company. (At 344G - H and 345H - I.) Cases Considered Annotations: Reported cases E Ex parte Graaff-Reinet Rollermeule (Edms) Bpk 2000 (4) SA 670 (E): not Ex parte Russlyn Construction (Pty) Ltd 1987 (1) SA 33 (D): followed Ex parte Screen Media Ltd 1991 (3) SA 462 (W): followed Ex part......
-
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa and Others v Driveline
...if this new reason for dismissal had been alleged, there is no reason why it cannot be successful at this stage. In fact, if past J 2000 (4) SA p670 Mogoeng AJA experience is anything to go A by, there would be greater prospects of conciliation now than there would have been earlier because......
-
Die proses
...not, they may be guilty of carrying on the business of an insolvent company.” Sien ook Ex parte Graaff-Reinet Rollermeule (Edms) Bpk 2000 (4) SA 670 (E).8 63 van 1973: art 427(3); Sharrock ea 1996:264.9 Blackman 1993:543. “As such, the employee is given no say in the matter.” Volgens Blackm......
-
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa and Others v Driveline
...if this new reason for dismissal had been alleged, there is no reason why it cannot be successful at this stage. In fact, if past J 2000 (4) SA p670 Mogoeng AJA experience is anything to go A by, there would be greater prospects of conciliation now than there would have been earlier because......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Ex parte New Seasons Auto Holdings (Pty) Ltd
...the company. (At 344G - H and 345H - I.) Cases Considered Annotations: Reported cases E Ex parte Graaff-Reinet Rollermeule (Edms) Bpk 2000 (4) SA 670 (E): not Ex parte Russlyn Construction (Pty) Ltd 1987 (1) SA 33 (D): followed Ex parte Screen Media Ltd 1991 (3) SA 462 (W): followed Ex part......
-
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa and Others v Driveline
...if this new reason for dismissal had been alleged, there is no reason why it cannot be successful at this stage. In fact, if past J 2000 (4) SA p670 Mogoeng AJA experience is anything to go A by, there would be greater prospects of conciliation now than there would have been earlier because......
-
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa and Others v Driveline
...if this new reason for dismissal had been alleged, there is no reason why it cannot be successful at this stage. In fact, if past J 2000 (4) SA p670 Mogoeng AJA experience is anything to go A by, there would be greater prospects of conciliation now than there would have been earlier because......
-
Pocock v Huysamen
...of the order of the court when so declared, that is a decision in Lebeloane v Lebeloane 2001 (1) SA 1079 at p1084 and Tshetlo v Tshetlo 2000 (4) SA 670. Applying the dicta in Sun Packaging (Pty) Ltd v Vreanlik 1996 (4) SA 176 A at 184 A-E. The determining factor (in the interpretation of a ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Die proses
...not, they may be guilty of carrying on the business of an insolvent company.” Sien ook Ex parte Graaff-Reinet Rollermeule (Edms) Bpk 2000 (4) SA 670 (E).8 63 van 1973: art 427(3); Sharrock ea 1996:264.9 Blackman 1993:543. “As such, the employee is given no say in the matter.” Volgens Blackm......