Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Judge | Trollip J |
Judgment Date | 05 August 1964 |
Hearing Date | 05 August 1964 |
Court | Witwatersrand Local Division |
E Trollip, J.:
This is an application under sec. 103 of the Companies Act for an order convening meetings of creditors of the applicant company to approve a certain arrangement entered into between the applicant company and its creditors. The company carries on the business of property owners in Johannesburg. It has an authorised share capital of R2,000 F divided into 1,000 shares of R2 each of which only eight shares have been issued, all fully paid up and equally held by Mrs. Margaret Ann Botbyl and her husband, Willem Cornelius Botbyl, who is insolvent. The main and only asset of the company is a multi-storey block of flats which is valued at R200,864. The liabilities of the company are, first, second and third mortgage bonds in favour of Koopkrag Spaarbank Beperk G amounting in all to R181,225; current liabilities which are estimated at R2,471; and in addition an amount of R25,518 which is owed by the company to the two Botbyls.
The two Botbyls are, as I have already indicated, the only shareholders and presumably the only directors of the company. They have endeavoured, H from time to time, to dispose of the shares in the company and of the company's assets but so far they have failed to reach any satisfactory agreement in regard thereto. However, the petition states that the trustees of Mr. Botbyl and Mrs. Botbyl herself have now entered into an agreement with one Foutopoulos in regard to the sale of the shares of the company. This agreement is annexed to the petition. It is between the two shareholders and Foutopoulos in terms of which the shareholders sell their shares in the company to Foutopoulos for R10 plus certain additional minor considerations which I need not
Trollip J
refer to. Foutopoulos, in terms of the agreement, undertakes to lend the company about R75,000 and the parties agree that through Foutopoulos it will raise R120,000 on a new first mortgage bond over the company's A property. The total proceeds of these arrangements, namely R195,000, are to be utilised to pay off the present bondholder and the concurrent creditors, other than the two Botbyls, and certain expenses in full. These payments are estimated to amount to about R188,300 which would leave a balance of about R6,700 which would be paid to the two Botbyls, B who have agreed (in Mr. Botbyl's case his trustees on his behalf) to accept it in full settlement of their claims against the company. It is to be noted that the company itself is not a party to this agreement between the Botbyls and Foutopoulos. In addition the agreement stipulates that it is to be subject to a condition that a so-called offer C of compromise, which is attached to and made part of the agreement, and which has to be made on behalf of the company by Mrs. Botbyl to its creditors along the lines indicated above, is sanctioned by the Court under sec. 103. This offer is to be made on behalf of the company and its effect is as stated above, namely that the company will pay all the secured and concurrent creditors except the Botbyls in full, and the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Corporate control transactions in South Africa : chapter 4 : part two : South Africa on corporate control
...exter-nal companies and any other bodies corporate. Companies Act 61 of 1973: section 337.103 Ex parte Cyr ildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): 308.104 Ex parte Millman NNO: In re Multi-Bou (Pty) Ltd 1987 (4) SA 405 (C).105 Ex parte Kaplan NNO: In re Robin Consolidated Industries L......
-
Averting Liquidations with Business Rescue: Does a Section 155 Compromise Place the Bar too High?
...ringham, JL Yeats, FHI Cassim & R d e la Harpe Comm entary on the Companies Act (RS 9 2012) 12–5 Ex parte C yrildene Heights ( Pty) Ltd 1966 1 SA 307 (W) 308; Ex parte Bruyns: In re Cove rite (Pty) Ltd 1968 1 SA 51 (W) 52 See also Sneath v Valley Gold Lt d [1893] 1 Ch 477 494 (CA); Mercanti......
-
M & v Tractor & Implement Agencies BK v Vennootskap D S U Cilliers & Seuns en Andere (Kelrn Vervoer (Edms) Bpk Tussenbeitredend); M & v Tractor & Implement Agencies BK v Hoogkwartier Landgoed (Edms) Bpk (Kelrn Vervoer (Edms) Bpk Tussenbeitredend); M & v Tractor & Implement Agencies Bk v Olierivier Landgoed (Edms) Bpk (Kelrn Vervoer (Edms) Bpk Tussenbeitredend)
...not followed H Courier Townhouse (Pty) Ltd v Myers 1986 (4) SA 1038 (K): na verwys/referred to Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): na verwys/referred to Dadoo Ltd and Others v Krugersdorp Municipal Council 1920 AD 530: na verwys/referred to I Flax v Berliner: Houndsdit......
-
Investec Employee Benefits Ltd and Another v Electrical Industry KwaZulu-Natal Pension Fund and Others
...Service, and Others 2008 (2) SA 433 (SCA) ([2008] 2 All SA 125): dictum in para [3] applied H Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): dictum at 309A - D Ex parte Liberty Life Association of Africa Ltd and Another 1976 (1) SA 58 (W): dictum at 69F - G applied Ex parte Lomat......
-
M & v Tractor & Implement Agencies BK v Vennootskap D S U Cilliers & Seuns en Andere (Kelrn Vervoer (Edms) Bpk Tussenbeitredend); M & v Tractor & Implement Agencies BK v Hoogkwartier Landgoed (Edms) Bpk (Kelrn Vervoer (Edms) Bpk Tussenbeitredend); M & v Tractor & Implement Agencies Bk v Olierivier Landgoed (Edms) Bpk (Kelrn Vervoer (Edms) Bpk Tussenbeitredend)
...not followed H Courier Townhouse (Pty) Ltd v Myers 1986 (4) SA 1038 (K): na verwys/referred to Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): na verwys/referred to Dadoo Ltd and Others v Krugersdorp Municipal Council 1920 AD 530: na verwys/referred to I Flax v Berliner: Houndsdit......
-
Investec Employee Benefits Ltd and Another v Electrical Industry KwaZulu-Natal Pension Fund and Others
...Service, and Others 2008 (2) SA 433 (SCA) ([2008] 2 All SA 125): dictum in para [3] applied H Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): dictum at 309A - D Ex parte Liberty Life Association of Africa Ltd and Another 1976 (1) SA 58 (W): dictum at 69F - G applied Ex parte Lomat......
-
Ex parte Liquidator, Vautid Wear Parts (Pty) Ltd (In Liquidation)
...McAlpine & Son (Pty) Ltd v Transvaal Provincial Administration 1977 (4) SA 310 (T): referred to Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): Du Preez and Another v Garber: In re Die Boerebank Bpk 1963 (1) SA 806 (W): referred to F Fundstrust (Edms) Bpk (in Likwidasie) v Marais ......
-
Kleena Industries (Pty) Ltd v Senator Insurance Co Ltd
...in Ex parte Standard Trading Co (Pty) Ltd: In re Backerian (Pty) Ltd 1954 (4) SA 81 (W); Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W) and Metal Box Co of SA Ltd v A S Dunstan (Pty) Ltd 1974 (2) SA 208 (T). Mr Browde relied heavily on these authorities but in my opinion care must......
-
Corporate control transactions in South Africa : chapter 4 : part two : South Africa on corporate control
...exter-nal companies and any other bodies corporate. Companies Act 61 of 1973: section 337.103 Ex parte Cyr ildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W): 308.104 Ex parte Millman NNO: In re Multi-Bou (Pty) Ltd 1987 (4) SA 405 (C).105 Ex parte Kaplan NNO: In re Robin Consolidated Industries L......
-
Averting Liquidations with Business Rescue: Does a Section 155 Compromise Place the Bar too High?
...ringham, JL Yeats, FHI Cassim & R d e la Harpe Comm entary on the Companies Act (RS 9 2012) 12–5 Ex parte C yrildene Heights ( Pty) Ltd 1966 1 SA 307 (W) 308; Ex parte Bruyns: In re Cove rite (Pty) Ltd 1968 1 SA 51 (W) 52 See also Sneath v Valley Gold Lt d [1893] 1 Ch 477 494 (CA); Mercanti......
-
Some comments on the application of the Securities Regulation Code on Takeovers and Mergers
...See Du Preez v Garber supra note 91 at 813; Ex parte NBSA Centre supra note 15 at 801. 104 See Ex parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd 1966 (1) SA 307 (W) at 309; Ex parte Lomati Landgoed supra note 15 at 521; Ex parte NBSA Centre supra note 15 at 787; Ex parte Mielie-Kip Ltd 1991 (3) SA 449 (......
-
Case Comments: The Debate on the Meaning and Application of ‘Arrangement’: Before and after Senwes v Van Heerden & Sons
...the one prescribed inss 83-89 of the Companies Act rather than the s 311 procedure. Then there isEx parte Cyrildene Heights (Pty) Ltd (1966 (1) SA 307 (W)) where the Court,per Trollip J, observed (at 309E-F) that ‘I do not think that the court shouldexercise its discretion in favour of an a......