Your World of Legal Intelligence
 South Africa | 1-800-335-6202

During NO v Boesak and Another

Judgment South Africa Law Reports Cited authorities 36 Cited in 54 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1990 (3) SA 661 (A)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
54 practice notes
  • Neethling v Du Preez and Others; Neethling v the Weekly Mail and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...1949 (1) SA 830 (A); Minister of J Law and Order v Hurley 1986 (3) SA 568 (A) at 1994 (1) SA p710 A 587B-589G; During NO v Boesak 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) at 672H-680C; Minister of Justice v Hofmeyr 1993 (3) SA 131 (A) at 153B-I; Iyman v Natal Witness Printing & Publications Co (Pty) Ltd 1991 (4......
  • Jacobs en 'n Ander v Waks en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...dat die stadsraad se besluit ultra vires was en dus nietig is J (sien 1992 (1) SA p536 Botha AR A bv During NO v Boesak and Another 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) op 676A-D). Ons moet nog kom by die vraag of die Hof a quo se bevinding korrek is, maar om die vraag na locus standi uit te maak moet daar,......
  • Fink and Another v Bedfordview Town Council and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...310; Johannesburg City Council v The Administrator, Transvaal, and Mayofis 1971 (1) SA 87 (A) at 96A-D; During NO v Boesak and Another 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) at 663G-H, 664B-C, I 675F, 679G-I; Glencairn Buildings Ltd v Johannesburg Municipality 1926 TPD 68 at 80; Southern Transvaal Buildings (......
  • Francis George Hill Family Trust v South African Reserve Bank and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...AD 642. As to the onus of showing that reasonable grounds had existed for attaching the J assets, see During NO v Boesak and Another 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) at 1992 (3) SA p93 A 672D-673H, 677A-I, 678A-C, 680B-C; Newman v Prinsloo 1973 (1) SA 125 (W) at 127; Inland Revenue Commissioner and Anot......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
52 cases
  • Neethling v Du Preez and Others; Neethling v the Weekly Mail and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...1949 (1) SA 830 (A); Minister of J Law and Order v Hurley 1986 (3) SA 568 (A) at 1994 (1) SA p710 A 587B-589G; During NO v Boesak 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) at 672H-680C; Minister of Justice v Hofmeyr 1993 (3) SA 131 (A) at 153B-I; Iyman v Natal Witness Printing & Publications Co (Pty) Ltd 1991 (4......
  • Jacobs en 'n Ander v Waks en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...dat die stadsraad se besluit ultra vires was en dus nietig is J (sien 1992 (1) SA p536 Botha AR A bv During NO v Boesak and Another 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) op 676A-D). Ons moet nog kom by die vraag of die Hof a quo se bevinding korrek is, maar om die vraag na locus standi uit te maak moet daar,......
  • Fink and Another v Bedfordview Town Council and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...310; Johannesburg City Council v The Administrator, Transvaal, and Mayofis 1971 (1) SA 87 (A) at 96A-D; During NO v Boesak and Another 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) at 663G-H, 664B-C, I 675F, 679G-I; Glencairn Buildings Ltd v Johannesburg Municipality 1926 TPD 68 at 80; Southern Transvaal Buildings (......
  • Francis George Hill Family Trust v South African Reserve Bank and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...AD 642. As to the onus of showing that reasonable grounds had existed for attaching the J assets, see During NO v Boesak and Another 1990 (3) SA 661 (A) at 1992 (3) SA p93 A 672D-673H, 677A-I, 678A-C, 680B-C; Newman v Prinsloo 1973 (1) SA 125 (W) at 127; Inland Revenue Commissioner and Anot......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT