Applying the CISG via the rules of private international law : Articles 1(1)(b) and 95 of the CISG - analysing CISG Advisory Council Opinion 15
Author | Marlene Wethmar-Lemmer |
DOI | 10.10520/EJC193482 |
Date | 01 January 2016 |
Published date | 01 January 2016 |
Pages | 58-73 |
58
Applying the CISG via the rules of private
international law: Articles 1(1)(b) and 95 of
Opinion 15
Marlene Wethmar-Lemmer
BCom LLB LLM MA LLD
Associate Professor, College of Law, University of South Africa
OPSOMMING
Toepassing van die Weense Koopverdrag via die internasionale privaatreg:
Artikels 1(1)(b) en 95 van die CISG – ’n analise van die
CISG Advisory Council
Opinie
Die Weense Koopverdrag (bekend onder die Engelse akroniem ‘CISG’) is ’n
invloedryke internasionale verdrag wat tans vyf en tagtig lidstate
verteenwoordigend van alle regstradisies het. Indien van toepassing,
reguleer die verdrag die totstandkoming sowel as die regte en verpligtinge
van die koper en verkoper tot ’n internasionale koopkontrak vir roerende
goedere. Ingevolge artikel 1(1) van die CISG is die verdrag van toepassing
indien (a) die partye tot die koopkontrak van verskillende lidstate
afkomstig is of (b) indien die reëls van die internasionale privaatreg lei tot
die toepassing van die reg van ’n lidstaat. Artikel 95 van die CISG magtig ’n
lidstaat om ’n voorbehoud te maak dat die betrokke lidstaat nie aan artikel
1(1)(b) gebonde is nie. Die voorbehoud het ’n beduidende invloed op die
toepassingsgebied van die verdrag en die korrekte interpretasie van die
bepaling is dus van groot belang vir howe in lidlande en nie-lidlande. Die
interpretasie van die artikel 95-voorbehoud het al tot baie kontroversie en
akademiese kommentaar aanleiding gegee. Onlangs het die CISG Advisory
Council ’n opinie oor die interpretasie van die bepaling gepubliseer en daar
word voorsien dat hierdie interpretasie heel invloedryk sal wees. In hierdie
bydrae word die CISG Advisory Council se interpretasie van die impak van
’n artikel 95 – voorbehoud op die CISG se toepassingsgebied ontleed.
1Introduction
The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of
law rules to govern the formation of international contracts for the sale
of goods, as well as the rights and obligations of buyers and sellers.2
1 UN Doc A/CONF 97/18: 1489 UNTS. This Convention was adopted at a
diplomatic conference of the United Nations held in Vienna during 1980
and entered into force on 1988-01-01; available from http://www.
uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/sales/cisg/V1056997-CISG-e-book.pdf
(accessed 2015-07-15).
How to cite: Wethmar-Lemmer ‘Applying the CISG via the rules of private international law: Articles 1(1)(b) and
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2016/v49n1a4
Applying the CISG via the rules of private international law 59
According to article 1(1) of the CISG, the CISG ‘applies to contracts of
sale of goods between parties whose places of business are in different
states (a) when the states are contracting states or (b) when the rules of
private international law lead to the application of the law of a CISG
contracting state’.3
Given the large number of contracting states, representative of all legal
traditions, as well as its important subject matter, the CISG is one of the
most influential international conventions to date. The number of
contracting states to the CISG has increased from 73 to 85 in the last five
years.4 Even though South Africa is not a contracting state as yet, most
Africa, therefore, should accede to the Convention as soon as possible.6
It would also ensure regional harmonisation of international sales law if
all Southern African Development Country (SADC) states were to accede
CISG contracting states from 1988 and 1991 respectively, and Brazil
acceded in 2013.9 It would therefore promote international trade
between BRICS states if India and South Africa would follow Brazil’s
recent example and accede to the CISG.
Article 95 of the CISG impacts upon the convention’s scope of
application and this provision’s interpretation, therefore, is of paramount
importance for correct application of the Convention. In light of the
of the scope of application from a South African vantage point, see Hugo
‘The United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods: Its
scope of application from a South African perspective’ 1999 SA Me rc LJ 1;
Wethmar-Lemmer ‘When could a South African court be expected to apply
private international law in harmonising international sales law’ 2014 SA
Merc LJ 93.
4 See the status document detailing all contracting states as well as their date
of signature, accession or ratification of the Convention, available from
http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/sale_goods/1980CISG_sta
tus.html (accessed 2016-07-19).
5 South Africa’s largest trading partners are currently China, the United States
and Germany – see http://www.southafricaweb.co.za/page/trade-and-indus
try-south-africa (accessed 2015-07-15) in this regard. All three of South
Africa’s largest trading partners are CISG contracting states (as indicated on
the status document).
6 Eiselen ‘Adoption of the Vienna Convention for the International Sales of
Sales Convention: Reflections eight years down the line’ 2007 SA Merc LJ
14.
7 Wethmar-Lemmer 2014 SA Merc LJ supra n 3 at 109.
8 BRICS is an acronym for five of the major emerging economies, namely
Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. For more information, access
the BRICS Information Sharing and Exchanging Platform available from
http://www.brics-info.org/ (accessed 2016-07-21).
9 UNCITRAL ‘Status: United Nations Convention on Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods’ 2016 available from http://www.uncitral.
org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/sale_goods/1980CISG_status.html (accessed
2016-07-19).
To continue reading
Request your trial