When the truth lies elsewhere: A comment on the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements in light of S v Mathonsi 2012 (1) SACR 335 (KZP) and S v Rathumbu 2012 (2) SACR 219 (SCA)
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Date | 16 August 2019 |
Author | Adrian Bellengere |
Citation | (2013) 26 SACJ 175 |
Pages | 175-185 |
Published date | 16 August 2019 |
COMMENT
When the truth lies elsewhere:
A comment on the admissibility of
prior inconsistent statements in light
(KZP) and S v Rathumbu 2012 (2)
SACR 219 (SCA)
ADRIAN BELLENGÈRE AND SHELLEY WALKER
University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
1. Introduction
There can be few more frustrat ing experiences for a prosecutor than
to call a witness to testif y on the strength of the witnes s’s sworn
statement, only for the witness to perform an about-tur n in the witness
box and testify in favour of the defence, or develop a sudden case of
amnesia. Part of this f rustration must inevit ably stem from the long-
standing rule of common law, derived from English law, that in such
cases the witness’s sworn statement may be used solely for purposes
of impeaching and cross-ex amining him a nd may not be tendered
into court as proof of the facts contai ned therein. Quite often this
will mean that the prosec ution is left stranded, without suf ficient
evidence even to place the accused on his defence, let alone achieve a
conviction. Recently, however, this rule was revisited by the KwaZulu-
Natal Provincial Division of the High Cour t (‘the KZP’) in S v Mathons i
(2012 (1) SACR 335 (KZP)), followed shortly by the decision of the
Supreme Court of Appeal (‘the SCA’) in S v Rathumbu 2012 (2) SACR
219 (S CA ).
2. The rationale behind the rule
Considering that the rule was applied with such consis tency for
so many years, it is surprisingly di fficult to pinpoint its rationale
with any degree of certaint y. For the most part, the leading South
African commentators merely rest ate the rule, without addressing its
175
(2013) 26 SACJ 175
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
To continue reading
Request your trial