The South African Financial Cycle and its Relation to Household Deleveraging

Published date01 June 2020
Date01 June 2020
AuthorSteven F. Koch,Adél Bosch
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12245
South African Journal of Economics Vol. 88:2 June 2020
doi: 10.1111/saje.12245
145
© 2020 Economic Society of South Africa
THE SOUTH AFRICAN FINANCIAL CYCLE AND ITS
RELATION TO HOUSEHOLD DELEVERAGING
ADÉL BOSCH*,†,‡ AND STEVEN F. KOCH
Abstract
This paper considers the extent to which South African households have deleveraged, since the
global financial crisis of 2007/2008. We extend the official South African Reserve Bank business
cycle methodology to date financial cycles, from which we identify the peaks and troughs of the
South African financial cycle going back to 1966. Our composite financial cycle index peaks in
April 1974, January 1984 and May 2007; it has bottomed out in July 1979 and February 1999.
Thus, we still await the trough. We further compare and contrast the deleveraging process in the
current downward phase to the experiences from previous financial cycles. We find that the average
period of the financial cycle in South Africa is much longer (approximately 17.3 years) than that of
the business cycle (approximately 5.8 years), and that deleveraging has not yet matched the degree
of deleveraging seen in previous downward phases. Our results suggest that further deleveraging is
necessary, before we can expect to turn the financial corner.
JEL Classification: E32, E44, E61, G01
Keywords: business cycles, macroeconomy, policy coordination, financial crises
1. INTRODUCTION
The 2007/2008 global financial crisis raised important questions about the behaviour of
financial cycles and the length of time it takes households to deleverage from the peak,
especially when the upward phase of a financial cycle is supported by an asset bubble.
When an asset price bubble bursts, asset prices fall sharply, making it harder for house-
holds to sell off assets (usually not by choice) or to use them as collateral. Interest rates
may fall rapidly in an attempt to support the economy, succeeding in lowering general
debt levels, but that may not fully describe household financial health. Furthermore, the
link between deleveraging and economic activity has not received much attention (see
Dynan, 2012), although Brown et al. (2011), and Bricker et al. (2011) examine balance
sheet adjustment while households deleverage. Thus, we add to a small, but growing
literature that considers the behaviour of the financial cycle, with a focus on households.
Typical post-war recessions, according to Borio (2014) were triggered by monetary
policy attempts to contain inflation. However, when a financial boom originates in an
* Corresponding author: Adel Bosch, Phd candidates, Department of Economics, University of
Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa. E-mail: Adel.Bosch@resbank.co.za
Economist, Statistics Department, South African Reserve Bank
Department of Economics, University of Pretoria
The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the official views of the South
African Reserve Bank Group.
South African Journal
of Economics
146 South African Journal of Economics Vol. 88:2 June 2020
© 2020 Economic Society of South Africa
environment of low and stable inflation, but then bursts, it becomes what Koo (2013)
refers to as a “balance sheet” or financial cycle recession, where companies seek to repay
excessive debts instead of seeking profit. Reinhart and Rogoff (2009) show that financial
cycle recessions are deeper and followed by weaker recoveries, because, as Borio et al.
(2014) suggests, policy makers in these situations have little room for policy manoeu-
vring. In 24 advanced economies, since the 1960s, Bech et al. (2014) find that monetary
policy is relatively ineffective in a balance sheet recession and its subsequent recovery.
Evidence also suggests that the amplitude, length and potential disruptive force of the
financial cycle are closely related to the financial, and possibly also, monetary regimes in
place (e.g. Lowe and Borio, 2002; Drehmann et al., 2012).
Since the global financial crisis, international literature has advanced our understand-
ing of the impact of asset prices and financial markets on the real economy and business
cycles. These financial drivers (excessive growth in house prices, credit extension and asset
prices – an asset bubble) manifest in what is commonly referred to as the financial cycle
(Adarov, 2018). Most empirical research on the financial cycle focuses on developed
economies or groups of emerging market economies (see Borio, 2014; Borio et al., 2017;
Claessens et al., 2011, 2012; Drehmann et al., 2012; Schularick and Taylor, 2012;
Aikman et al., 2015; Gonzalez et al., 2015),1 while empirical findings from South Africa
are focussed mainly on determining and characterising the financial cycle (Boshoff, 2005,
2010; Kabundi and Mbelu, 2017; Farrell and Kemp, 2018). What is missing for South
Africa, is an analysis of the aftermath of the global financial crisis, when policy making
and its timing is most crucial. A full analysis of credit supply conditions, however, falls
outside of the scope of this paper.
There are a growing number of studies measuring and describing financial cycles. They
generally find that such cycles display vastly different properties than business cycles,
which have, in general, received more attention.2 The financial cycle is usually measured
by three key financial variables, credit, equity and house prices (e.g. Kindleberger and
Aliber, 2005; Minsky, 1992; Claessens et al., 2011, 2012). Farrell and Kemp (2018)
consider similar information, when they determine the financial cycle for South Africa.
In this research, we confirm the main points from their analysis, applying different meth-
ods. We also extend their research by comparing the behaviour of debt, with a particular
focus on the deleveraging process, across the financial cycles that we were able to date.
Thus, we are able to provide a series of stylised facts about the behaviour of financial
variables during the financial cycle; such information should be of use to policy makers –
monetary, regulatory and fiscal – as it can be used to underpin the design of optimal
policy.
We uncover a clear debt build-up in the lead-up to the 2007/2008 global financial
crisis, preceding a slow and difficult deleveraging process that continues. We identify the
1 Borio et al. (2017) looks at the US, while Borio (2014) and Drehmann et al. (2012) look at 7
developed countries. Claessens et al. (2011) analyses 21 advanced economies and Claessens et al.
(2012) divide 44 countries into 21 advanced countries and 23 emerging market economies.
Schularick and Taylor (2012) and Aikman et al. (2015) look at 14 developed economies, while
Gonzalez et al. (2015) groups South Africa together with 27 other countries.
2 Burns and Mitchell (1946) originally proposed the business cycle definition that has supported
decades of research on the business cycle.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT