The regulation of insurance brokers — time to tighten the reins?

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Pages30-41
Date25 May 2019
AuthorTamara Cohen
Published date25 May 2019
The Regulation of Insurance Brokers
Time to Tighten the Reins?
TAMARA COHEN*
University of Natal, Durban
1 Introduction
Despite the fact that in South Africa millions of rands are handled by
insurance brokers annually, there are no legislative restrictions or
requirements to be complied with before one commences operations as
an insurance broker. This dearth of regulation is surprising in light of the
confusion surrounding the role of the insurance broker, an intermediary
who at times occupies the incongruous position of representing the
interests of two conflicting principals — the insurer and the insured. This
is compounded by the fact that the insured is reliant upon the broker for
impartial and skilled advice. This article will be considering whether this
uncontrolled and indiscriminate use of the tag 'insurance broker'
1
should
be subject to regulation, and if so, what form this regulation should take.
2 Agent for Insurer or Insured?
The principal types of intermediary who arranges insurance cover are
insurance brokers and insurance agents, and the fundamental difference
between them, according to Lush
J
in
Norwich Fire Insurance Society Ltd
v Brennans (Horsham) Pty Ltd,
2
is
'between a person, firm or company which carries on an independent business of placing
insurances upon the instructions of clients and whose basic relationship of agency is with
the client and the insurer's agent whose function is to procure persons to insure with his
principal, the insurer, and whose basic relationship of agency is therefore with the
insurer'.
While this differentiation between the role of the insurance broker and
the insurance agent appears to be quite defined, in practice this
distinction is not as clear. The broker is usually authorized by the
insured to advise on the nature and quantum of insurance cover required,
to procure such cover at the most competitive rate from the most
appropriate insurance company, and to conduct all subsequent insurance
business pertaining to the contract, such as its variation, execution and
enforcement. In performing these functions it is undeniable that the broker
is acting as the agent and representative of the insured. The uncertainty
arises in that the broker is not normally remunerated by the insured but is
* BA LLB (Natal). Lecturer in the Department of Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of
Natal, Durban.
1
See NG Atkins 'Insurance in the Free Market. When Is a Broker . . .?' (1985) 15
Businessman's Law
3.
[1981] VR 981 (SC Vict) at 985.
30
(1997) 9 SA Merc LJ 30
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT