The regulation of False Advertising in South Africa: An analysis of The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and Self-Regulation

AuthorMupangavanhu, Y.
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v33/i2a5
Published date13 January 2022
Date13 January 2022
Citation(2021) 33 SA Merc LJ 260
Pages260-288
THE REGULATION OF FALSE ADVERTISING
IN SOUTH AFRICA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 68 OF 2008
AND SELF-REGULATION
YEUKAI MUPANGAVANHU*
Associate Professor, University of Western Cape
DOMINIQUE KERCHHOFF**
Former student, University of the Western Cape
Abstract
The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) regulates the
provision of goods and services, the conclusion of consumer contracts as
well as the promotion and marketing of goods and services. It also
protects consumers from unscrupulous advertisers who use false and
misleading advertisements to induce consumers to enter into contracts
which they would otherwise not have concluded. This article seeks to
critically analyse the legislative provisions relating to false, misleading,
and deceptive advertising, and the seemingly accessible and efficient
legal redress mechanism created under the CPA. Self-regulation by
bodies such as the Advertising Regulatory Board, which is responsible
for the regulation of the advertising industry in South Africa, is also
discussed in detail. The article concludes that the co-existence of the
CPA and self-regulation is pertinent to ensure that consumers are
adequately protected from unscrupulous advertisements. This is
because self-regulation provides an additional layer of protection to
consumers. It is also argued that the forums created under the CPA
should be given powers to declare certain promotional activities and
advertisements unfair, unjust or unreasonable.
Keywords: Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008; false and misleading
advertising; Consumer Goods and Services Ombud; marketing practices;
informed choices; self-regulation
*LLB (UF), LLM LLD (UWC).
** LLB, LLM (UWC).
260
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v33/i2a5
(2021) 33 SA Merc LJ 260
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
IINTRODUCTION
Consumers are constantly bombarded with advertisements be it in the
form of print media, billboards, television or on social media. Suppliers
and businesses spend huge amounts of money trying to inform consum-
ers about their range of products and specif‌ic characteristics of their
individual brands.
1
This is because a good eye-catching advertisement
can determine how the public view the business thereby creating a sense
of brand loyalty amongst consumers,
2
as advertisements play a signif‌i-
cant role in inf‌luencing consumer choices. The issue arises when the
information contained in the advertisement is false, misleading or
deceitful. False advertising, also known as deceptive advertising, is
problematic since it misleads or deceives consumers about the products
or services sold by the manufacturer. This can result in consumers and
particularly the vulnerable members of society, not only making
ill-informed decisions or an error in judgement but also in losing their
hard-earned money.
3
An advertisement that contains deceptive infor-
mation is consequently bound to be prejudicial to consumers.
4
This is
because false advertising has the effect of inducing the consumer to enter
into a contract, which he or she would not have entered into or would
have probably entered into but on different terms.
5
It is therefore unfair
to a consumer who is not in a position to make an informed decision.
The article examines the protection of consumers from false or deceptive
advertising in South Africa. The current legal framework that governs
false advertising consists of a hybrid system that comprises the common
law, statutory legislation as well as a self-regulatory system. However, the
article only discusses how false or misleading advertising is regulated
under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) and in terms of
1
Pardun (ed) et al, Advertising and Society: An Introduction 2 ed (Wiley 2014). Liebenberg,
‘Chapter 11: Out-of-home advertising’, available at https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/
enm-20120-chapter11.pdf, accessed on 12 December 2020. In 2019, an estimated amount of
R30.4 billion was spent only on advertising in South Africa. Internet advertising in South
Africa is expected to account for 25 per cent and it accounts for the second largest advertising
medium in the country after television and video. Mobile advertisements make up about
50 per cent of internet advertising revenue: see McQuerrey, ‘The positive effects of adver-
tising’, available at https://smallbusiness.chron.com/positive-effects-advertising-24688.html,
accessed on 11 February 2021. Guttman, ‘Advertising spending in South Africa 2018–2021, by
medium’ available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/386540/advertising-expenditures-
by-medium-south-africa/, accessed on 12 October 2020.
2
McQuerrey, ‘The positive effects of advertising’, available at https://small-
business.chron.com/positive-effects-advertising-24688.html, accessed on 11 February 2021.
3
Naudé & Eiselen, Commentary on the Consumer Protection Act (Juta 2015) 5.
4
Stoop, ‘The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and procedural fairness in consumer
contracts’ (2015) 18(4) PER/PELJ 1092 at 1099.
5
Stoop, (2015) 18(4) PER/PELJ 1092 at 1099.
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v33/i2a5
THE REGULATION OF FALSE ADVERTISING IN SOUTH AFRICA 261
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT