The promotional use of a trade mark: Its potential to have significance

Date24 May 2019
AuthorAlberts, W.
Published date24 May 2019
Pages1-15
THE PROMOTIONAL USE OF A
TRADE MARK: ITS POTENTIAL TO
H AV E S I G N I F I C A NC E

Professor of Mercant ile Law, University of Johannesburg
  
Products can be market ed in a number of ways, including through advert ising
and the distribut ion, usually for free, of goods not necessa rily related to the
core goods. A good example of this latter m anner of promoting products
is provided by pharmaceut ical companies, which often dist ribute goods of
a diverse nature to me dical practitioners, such as p ens, towels, soaps and
  
In trade mark law, being concer ned with trade, the q uestion that arises
           
question is traditiona lly considered in a non-use context — th at is, where a

However, importantly, this issue features i n a number of other contexts too
— a fact that is not always recognised . Certain case studies of judgments i n a
number of countries ar e presented below, whereafter a synt hesis is made. The
1 and thereafter t he situation in Austr alia,
Britain and South Af rica is considered.2
  
2.1 Non-use
The issue of promotional use was considered , in particula r, by the European
Court of Justice (ECJ )3 in the leading case of Silberquelle GmbH v Ma selli-
Strickmod e GmbH.4 The matter was an application for the revocation of a
        
BIur LLB (UFS) LLM LL D (Unisa).
1 The Europea n genesis of the South Afr ican Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993 is know n: C E Webster
and G E Morley South Af rican law of tra de marks 4 ed (1997) Serv ice issue November 2015
1–6. Reliance on Eu ropean (as well as British) author ities is thus not a controversia l approach:
R Kelbrick ‘Geogra phical names: Has Ce ntury Cit y changed the land scape? Centur y City
        SA
Merc LJ 513.
2 The focus is pri marily on statut ory law.
3 Now the Court of Just ice of the European Union (CJ EU).
4 Judgment of 15 January 2009, Case C -495/07 EU:C:2009:10. For a discussion of the case see
  
4 JIPLP 392.
1
(2017) IPLJ 1
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT