The constitutional protection of child witnesses in Zimbabwe’s criminal justice system

JurisdictionSouth Africa
AuthorRongedzayi Fambasayi
Date04 July 2019
Citation(2019) 32 SACJ 52
Published date04 July 2019
Pages52-75
The constitutional protection of
child witnesses in Zimbabwe’s
criminal justice system
RONGEDZAYI FAMBASAYI*
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the legal landscape and the readine ss of courts in Zimbabwe, in
the protection of child ren who are witnesses to cri me, this article prov ides
a descriptive historic al review of legal developments and reforms toward s
the promotion and protection of the r ights of child wit nesses. This is base d
on a constitutional fr amework, which has a strong recognit ion of human
rights, partic ularly a fairly extensive clause ent renching children’s rights. It
is contended that the entrench ment of children’s rights in the Con stitution
of Zimbabwe Amendment (No 20) Act, 2013 – in par ticular the right to
equality before the law, the right to be heard , the right to protection by the
courts and the bes t interests of the chi ld – is a remarkable step that opened
a door to an undeniable claim of access to j ustice for children. Reference
is made to internationa l law on the human rights of the ch ild and foreign
law, in particular South A frica, to highl ight notable comparative legal
developments that inform recom mendations and lessons that Z imbabwe
can learn.
1 Introduction
‘Court rooms are frightening places for anyone testifying. Even adults are
fearful about giving evidence in front of magistrates and judges, and about
being questioned by prosecutors and defence lawyers. Imagine how much
more scary that must be for a child.’1
Children testif ying in crimi nal proceedings, often called as the only
source of evidence2 or to complement evidence for the state or defence
case, require the protection of the law. It is recognised that due to their
vulnerabilities, as compared to adults, children who are witnesses to
crime (may) suffer depression, stigmatisation, anxiety, post-traumatic
* LLB (Hons) (Zimbabwe), PGDip (Child Sensitive Socia l Policies) (Zimbabwe), LLM
(North West University), Lect urer in Law, Great Zimbabwe University.
1 A Skelton in Centre for Child L aw, Ma king room: Facilitating the testi mony of child
witnesses and vic tims (2015) v.
2 In this inst ance the child may be the complaina nt or the accused testifying i n his or
her case.
52
(2019) 32 SACJ 52
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
stress disorder, fear, mistrust and poor self-e steem.3 At the international
and national frontiers, every child, i ncluding witnesses to crime, has
the right: to equality before the law; to equal protection of the law and
benet of the law; to be heard; and to have their best interests given
primary consideration.
The Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No 20) Act, 2013
(Constitution) has a strong recognition of human rights, including a
fairly extensive clause entrenching children’s rights.4 On the backdrop
of the 2013 constitutional framework, this contr ibution is an analysis of
the current legal landscape and the readiness of Zimbabwean courts to
protect child witnesses to cri me. It is limited in scope, with a focus on
reviewing legal texts conferring enforceable legal rights and interests.5
The term ‘child witness’ is used to refer to an eyewitness and/or
complainant to crime, to the exclusion of a child offender testif ying as
a witness in his or her own case. No reference to child witness is found
in the Constitution or even other statutor y instruments. On the strength
that the Constitution imposes a peremptory duty, when interpreting
the Declaration of Rights, to take into account international law that
Zimbabwe is a party to,6 reference is made to international children’s
rights law.
The contribution consists of several par ts of which this introduction
is the rst. The second part delves into the international obligations
of state parties to promote, respect and protect the rights of child
witnesses. This is followed by a descriptive survey of the legal
developments (legislative and judicial) and the constitutional protection
of child witnesses. The fourt h section is an exploration of best practices
from South African law.7 Subsequently, some recommendations and
reections are made, followed by the conclusion.
3 UWC Schoeman ‘A training program for inter mediaries for the child w itness in
South African courts’ (20 06) unpublished PhD the sis, University of Preto ria 146.
See also C Churr ‘Ch ild witnesses: T he battle to testif y’ (2010) 73, 3 Journal for
Contemporar y Roman-Dutch Law 384 -385 and DL Thomas ‘Child witnesse s and the
oath: empirical e vidence’ (2000) Southern California La w Review 1017 at 1018-102 1.
4 See section 81 of the Con stitution.
5 The protection of ch ild complainant s and witnesses to cr ime is interdisc iplinary,
in-cooperat ing various discipl ines like cri minology, victimolog y, social work and
psychology.
6 Section 46(1)(c) of the Constitution.
7 Section 46(1)(e) of the Constitution st ates that, when inter preting provisions of t he
Declaration of R ights, courts may con sider relevant foreign law.
The constitutional protection of child witnesses
in Zimbabwe’s criminal justice system 53
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT