The Black Flame (part two): Snyman’s Criminal Law

AuthorMosaka, T.B.
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v34/i3a2
Published date23 February 2022
Date23 February 2022
Citation(2021) 34 SACJ 442
Pages442-460
The Black Flame (part two):
Snyman’s Criminal Law
TSHEPO BOGOSI MOSAKA*
ABSTRACT
This is the second of a t rilogy of papers (entitled after WEB du Bois’s trilog y
of novels titled The Black Flam e) reviewing Snyman’s Criminal Law. The
decision to commence working on the review was m ade after encounteri ng
the unprecedented section on A frican customa ry law in the latest ed ition
of the book. This is a m ajor achievement for this work that promise s an
exciting change of direct ion. This paper focuses on four a reas in which
the book can proceed fu rther into thi s new direction. Thes e include:
(i) a comprehensive clarication of the underlying ju risdictional complex ity
within which Sout h African cr iminal law (as inher itor of Roman-Dutch and
English law) currently nds it self; (ii) the comparative nature and source of
Snyman’s preferred arrangement of hi s general principles of crim inal liabilit y;
(iii) the brief account of legal histor y in the introductor y section; and
(iv) the section on African custom ary crim inal law. The overall argument
made is that a northbou nd-gazing crim inal law scholarship ma kes
comparative crimi nal law between South A frica and European jurisdictions
virtual ly impossible. The next edit ion of Snyman’s Criminal Law wil l be
served better by a compar ative focus on African ju risdictions and les s
onEurope.
1 Introduction
Part One of this review sought to contextualise Snyman’s Criminal
Law by locating this tex t as an emerging third tradition of South
African cri minal law alongside the two dominant traditions
grounded in the work of Gardiner and Lansdown1 and De Wet and
* LLB (Wits) LLM (UC T) PhD (Nottingham), Lectu rer in Law, Faculty of Law, University
of Cape Town.
1 FG Gardiner & CW H Lansdown Sou th African Criminal L aw and Procedure
Vols I and II (1917) was published in si x editions, the la st of which appeared i n
1957, until the series was taken over by EM Bur chell & PMA Hunt South African
Criminal Law and Pr ocedure (formerly Gar diner and Lansdow n) (1970). Burchell
& Hunt’s text was initi ally published in t wo volumes, but four additional volume s
later appeared. The l atest successors in t his long tradition a re Jonathan Burchell
(Vol I), John Milton (Vol II) and the cohort of Shan non Hoctor, Michael Cowling
and John Milton (Vol III). Pieterm aritzburg ha s a long and rich histor y of crimin al
law scholarship – see J Burc hell ‘On the shoulders of fat her and son – academic
leadership in the law fac ulty of the Natal Un iversity College (lat er University of
Natal) in Pieterm aritzburg: 1920 to 1982’ in MA Kidd & SV Hocto r (eds) Stella Iuris:
Celebrating 100 Years of Teaching Law in Pie termaritzburg (2010) 32.
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v34/i3a2
442
(2021) 34 SACJ 442
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
Swanepoel.2 A remarkable feature of Snyman’s Criminal Law is it s
rich comparative law legacy of drawing from these two domi nant
traditions.3 However, one of its core shortcomings is that it contributes
further towards mak ing the already muddy terrain of South African
criminal law even muddier by persisti ng with the perennial
northbound-gaze away from Afr ica and towards Europe. As shown
in Part One, South Africa is littered with this type of comparative
criminal law, and is not in need of any more of it. Snyman’s Criminal
Law is an exciting project because the latest edition shows glimpses
of the charting of a new path th rough the raising of new questions
and the widening of scope in order that new souther n voices4 are
heard.5 Part Two of this review continues from the critique raised
in Part One and proceeds to identif y some of the main areas in
which Snyman’s Criminal L aw could improve by refocusing its
predominant attention away from Europe and more towards Afr ica.
Some of these areas include: the jurisdictional foundations of South
African cri minal law (discussed in Section 2 below); the arrangement
of the General Part (Section 3); legal history (Section 4); and the role
of African customa ry crimi nal law (Section 5).
This type of decolonia lising6 refocusing of South African criminal
law has particular relevance for crim inal justice, more than other
2 JC de Wet & HL Swanepoel Strafreg (1949) was published in four editions unt il 1985.
3 For example, Hoctor leaves Snyman’s advocatio n of a normative conception of
culpability, relying fou ndationally on Ger man crim inal law theor y, virtually in tact
(SV Hoctor Snyman’s Criminal Law 7ed (2020) 131–135), but then gives a brief
rejoinder (at 135–136). See generally, CR Snyma n ‘The normative conce pt of mens
rea: A new development in Germa ny’ (1979) 28 Internat & Comp L Q 211.
4 The ‘southern voices’ trop e is borrowed from the So uthern Criminology movement
that aims to widen t he focus of critica l criminolog y to include the ‘Global Sout h’;
see M Travers ‘The idea of south ern crimi nology’ (2019) 43 Internat J Comp & Appl
Crim Jus 1 (‘Souther n Criminolog y is another term for pos tcolonial crim inology
which was promoted by a few scholar s in the 1980s and 1990 s … The name
coined by Austral ian critical cr iminologist s such as Carri ngton et al (2015) seems
likely to stick’); K Carr ington et al ‘Sout hern crimi nology’ (2016) 56 Brit J Crim’y 1
(‘[W]e outline the cas e for the development of a more tran snational cri minology
that is inclusive of the exp eriences and persp ective of the Global Sout h’);
K Carringt on etal ‘Crimi nologies of the global sout h: Critical ree ctions’ (2019) 27
Critical Crim’y 163. See genera lly, K Carrington et a l (eds ) The Palgrave Handbook
of Criminology and the G lobal South (2018).
5 Hoctor op cit (n3) v.
6 One of the widest de nitions of decolonis ation is given by J Modir i ‘The aporias
of “decolonisation” in the Sout h African ac ademy’ in O Tello & S Motala (eds)
From Ivory Towers to Eb ony Towers: Transforming Humanities Cur ricula in
South Africa, Africa and Afr ican-American Studies (202 0) 157 at 159: ‘[T]he ter m
principally evokes st ruggles to overcome coloni al power and violence; seeking
fundamenta l change through dismantling wh ite supremacy; critically inter rogating,
provincializ ing and de-privi leging Western epistemolog ies and concepts; seeki ng
out alternative and new A frican and Globa l South knowledges and ways of b eing;
The Black Flame (part two): Snyman’s Criminal Law 443
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v34/i3a2
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT