The African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement: Aiding Intra-African trade towards deeper continental integration

AuthorZaire, D.
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47348/JCCL/V7/i2a2
Published date09 November 2022
Date09 November 2022
Citation(2021) 7(2) JCCL&P 16
Pages16-44
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCCL/V7/i2a2
16
THE AFRICAN CONTINENTAL
FREE TRADE AREA AGREEMENT:
AIDING INTRA-AFRICAN TRADE
TOWARDS DEEPER CONTINENTAL
INTEGRATION
DENNIS ZAIRE*
Senior Programme Manager, Konrad Adenauer, Namibia – PhD
Candidate, School of Law, University of Namibia
TAPIWA VICTOR WARIKANDWA
Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of Namibia
Abstract
The signing of the African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement
(AfCFTA) reflected many years of hard work by the continent’s
forefathers who include Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Julius Nyerere
of Tanzania, Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya, Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia,
Patrice Lumumba of Congo, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe and Frantz
Fanon of Algeria, but to mention a few. The AfCFTA also depicts the
novel work of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), and later
the African Union (AU), towards shaping a vision of continental
integration, embedded in the vision of the African Economic
Community (AEC), a by-product of the Abuja Treaty. Vision 2030
and the long-term continental vision of Agenda 2063: ‘The Africa We
Want’ are also designed to contribute towards deeper and successful
continental integration. However, by now the excitement over the
AfCFTA signing has subsided. For each member state, the reality of
being an AfCFTA party has started to sink in. Some member states
have expressed concern and fear over problems such as opening
their markets and accepting continental competition, allowing
free movement of persons and trade across borders. Others find it
too expensive to deal with the internal political fallout from their
populace’s scepticism regarding the agreement’s effects on jobs (due
to increased competition) and livelihoods. This article examines the
* LLB, LLM (University of Hull), LLM (Nottingham Trent University).
LLB, LLM, LLD (UFH).
(2021) 7(2) JCCL&P 16
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
17
AFCFTA: AIDING INTRA-AFRICA TRADE TOWARDS DEEPER CONTINENTAL
INTEGRATION
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCCL/V7/i2a2
AfCFTA to determine its impact and related advantages in respect of
continental trade policies. It discusses the advantages of the AfCFTA
and its potential challenges.
Keywords: African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement, Organisation
of African Unity, intra-African trade, continental integration
I INTRODUCTION
For decades, Africa was a playground for European and Western
colonialism and exploitation. In the process, African states had their
economic and political sovereignty taken away.1 As a consequence,
the continent is under-developed and remains a marginal player in
world trade.2 In addition, African countries trade less with each other
partly due to structural problems inherited from the colonial era that
include artificial colonial borders that have been a source of endless
conflicts and wars for decades. Inspired by this experience, Africa’s
founding fathers crafted and shaped a new path of political and
economic independence for the continent. In search of political and
economic independence and identity, the Organisation of African
Unity (OAU) was created. It served as a platform for intellectual
discussions, a framework from which to lobby, and a fire around
which African countries could gather to talk and engage each other,
strategise, unite the people and execute plans to free the continent
from the yoke of colonialism and economic exploitation. It also served
as a unifying instrument between the two ideological formations, the
Casablanca Group and the Monrovia Group.3
1 T V Warikandwa, A Nhemachema, N Mpofu & H Chitimira Grid-locked African
Economic Sovereignty, Decolonizing the Neo-Imperial Socio-Economic and Legal Force
Fields in the 21st Century (foreword) (2019).
2 For example, total trade from Africa to the rest of the world averaged US$760
463 million in the period 2015 – 2017, compared with US$ 481 081 million
from Oceania, US$4 109 131 million from Europe, US$5 139 649 million from
America and US$6 801 474 million from Asia. United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development, ‘UNTAD – Economic Development in Africa Report’
(2019) 18, available at https://unctad.org/webflyer/economic-development-
africa-report-2019, accessed on 23 April 2022.
3 In October 1960 in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, President Félix Houphouet-Boigny of
the Ivory Coast called a meeting of twelve French-speaking countries to discuss
whether they could intervene or otherwise assist in putting an end to the
Algerian conflict without upsetting France. This grouping of Cameroon, Central
African Republic, Chad, Congo (Brazzaville), Dahomey (now Benin), Gabon,
Ivory Coast, Malagasy (now Madagascar), Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, and Upper
Volta (now Burkina Faso) became known as the Brazzaville Group. In 1961, seven
other nations: Algeria, Egypt, Ghana, Guinea, Libya, Mali, and Morocco formed
the Casablanca Group. In 1961, the Monrovia Group was formed and included
all 12 Brazzaville Group nations as well as Ethiopia, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone,
Somalia, Togo, Tunisia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT