South African Consumer Credit Policy: Measures Indirectly Aimed at Preventing Consumer Over-indebtedness

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Published date25 May 2019
Date25 May 2019
AuthorPhilip N Stoop
Pages365-386
South African Consumer Credit Policy:
Measures Indirectly Aimed at Preventing
Consumer Over-indebtedness*
PHILIP N STOOP**
University of South Africa
1 Introduction: Policy Considerations and Essentials of
Consumer Legislation and Background to the South African
Act
The global economy boomed during the last two decades, largely because
credit was easy to grant and to access.
1
But this boom came at a price: the
unprecedented number of individuals and businesses that are over-indebted.
2
Legislation protecting debtors and directly or indirectly aimed at preventing
the problems of overspending is now an international phenomenon, though
differing from country to country, depending on local needs.
3
Generally,
though, it seeks to address the imbalance between the bargaining power of
credit providers and consumers, to combat malpractices by identifying and
prohibiting such malpractices, and to limit the free exercise of legal
remedies.
4
The South African Government identif‌ied the benef‌its of a working credit
industry that helps consumers to accumulate assets, exploit economic
opportunities and establish businesses.
5
For the enjoyment of those benef‌its,
though, the industry needs to be regulated, simply to ensure that consumer
abuses are minimised.
6
The South African Law Commission,
7
when
investigating the industry, received several requests for its deregulation.
8
Merchants and f‌inanciers claimed that consumer credit legislation irked them
* This article is based on a paper presented at the International Association of Consumer Law’s12th
International Conference on Consumer Law, at the Nalsar Law University, Hyderabad, India on 25-27
February 2009.
** BCom LLB LLM (UP). Senior Lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law, School of Law,
University of South Africa.
1
Melanie Roestoff & Stéfan Renke ‘Solving the Problems of Overspending Individuals’ (2003) 24
Obiter 1.
2
Idem at 4-6, referring to ‘The Preface to the International Federation of Insolvency Practitioners
Debt Committee’ report, INSOL International Consumer Debt Report:Report of Findings and
Recommendations (2001) (hence ‘INSOL Consumer Debt Report’).
3
JM Otto The National Credit Act Explained (2006) at 1.
4
Roestoff & Renke op cit note 1 at 16.
5
Department of Trade and Industry South Africa (‘the DTI’) Consumer Credit Law Reform: Policy
Framework for Consumer Credit (2004) at 6 (‘Policy Framework’), available at http://
www.thedti.gov.za/ccrdlawreview/policyjune2005.pdf.
6
Ibid.
7
South African Law Commission Working Paper 46, Project 67 (1993) ‘Part III: Policy
Considerations and the Essentials of Consumer Legislation’ at 47-66.
8
Idem at 54.
365
(2009) 21 SA Merc LJ 365
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
and that deregulation formed part of South Africa’s economic policy.
9
But the
Commission stated that consumer credit legislation is essential even in
market-oriented and capitalist economic systems and that, in fact, it is
in countries with the most unregulated economies that one f‌inds the most
comprehensive consumer protection legislation.
10
However, some writers,
merchants and f‌inanciers argue that consumer protection and credit legislation
should be abolished; they claim that contract law is based on freedom of
contract and that supply and demand alone should regulate the credit
industry.
11
One should keep in mind, though, that the credit provider and the
consumer are not of equal standing and that free competition will not
eliminate malpractices, simply because there are greedy f‌inanciers in every
society.
12
Consumer protection can be best achieved, therefore, by regulating
the credit industry. Appropriate legislation is aimed primarily at protecting
consumers; at the same time, credit providers’ reasonable expectation of a
prof‌it must also be protected.
13
Since the free market did not function properly
in South Africa, there was a need for comprehensive credit legislation that
regulated the market in almost every aspect of credit provision.
14
The most
important objectives of consumer credit legislation identif‌ied by the South
African Law Commission were that it must address the consumer’s unequal
bargaining position, curb malpractices, curb the exercise of remedies by credit
providers, protect only the consumer community, educate consumers, and
provide consumers with relevant information.
15
Given the considerable imbalance of power between credit providers and
consumers, low education levels, poorly informed consumers, weak disclo-
sure and deceptive marketing practices, many South African consumers have
concluded unaffordable credit contracts, and their over-indebtedness has led
to many social problems.
16
For these reasons, Parliament passed the
comprehensive National Credit Act (‘the Act’),
17
more prescriptive than its
predecessors and creating a more extensive enforcement framework.
18
Fully
operative since 1 June 2007, the Act protects a wide range of consumers,
including all private individuals, whatever their f‌inancial position.
19
It lays the
foundation for a regulated credit market that will contribute to unlocking
9
Ibid.
10
Ibid.
11
Ibid.
12
Idem at 54-5.
13
Idem at 58-9.
14
For example, from marketing to default (idem at 60).
15
Idem at 61-4.
16
Policy Framework op cit note 5 at 7. See also Therese Wilson ‘Responsible Lending or Restrictive
Lending Practices? Balancing Concerns Regarding Over-Indebtedness with Addressing Financial
Exclusion’ in: Michelle Kelly-Louw, James PNehf & Peter Rott (eds) The Future of Consumer Credit
Regulation: Creative Approaches to EmergingProblems (2008) 91 at 95.
17
34 of 2005. See also André Boraine ‘The Reform of Administration Orders within a New
Consumer Credit Framework’ in: Michelle Kelly-Louw,James P Nehf & Peter Rott (eds) The Future of
Consumer Credit Regulation: Creative Approachesto Emerging Problems (2008) 187 at 204-7.
18
See Boraine op cit note 17 at 204-7. The predecessors were the Credit AgreementsAct 75 of 1980
and the Usury Act 73 of 1968.
19
Otto op cit note 3 at 2.
(2009) 21 SA Merc LJ366
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT