S v Sekoere

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • 2015 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...36-7, 137S v Sehoole 2015 (2) SACR 196 (SCA) ................................................ 387-9S v Sekoere 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB)................................................... 57S v Sethoga 1990 (1) SA 270 (A) ......................................................... 243S v Shaik 2......
  • S v LB
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 1 April 2014
    ...in a way that will favour the child. See S v L M 2013 (1) SACR 188 (WCC) at [64]; S v F M 2013 (1) SACR 51 (GNP) and S v Sekoere 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB) at [28.2] and [10] Du Toit, Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act at 30 - 9 are in favour of an interpretation that favours the constitu......
  • Diversion in the South African criminal justice system: Emerging jurisprudence
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 24 May 2019
    ...at para [28].98 S v Arends supra (n93) at paras [28] and [36].99 S v Arends supra (n93) at paras [37] – [38].100 Section 59(1)(b).101 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB).102 S v Sekoere supr a (n101) at para [3].103 S v Sekoere supr a (n101) at para [4].104 S v Sekoere s upra (n101) at para [12].Diversi......
  • S v Speelman
    • South Africa
    • Eastern Cape Division
    • 31 August 2020
    ...p10 Rugunanan J I agree. It is so ordered. G. H. BLOEM JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT [1] Act No. 75 of 2008, as amended [2] See S v Sekoere 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB) which laid down that all matters falling within the provisions of s 85(1) of the CJA must be referred to the High Court for automatic ......
2 cases
  • S v LB
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 1 April 2014
    ...in a way that will favour the child. See S v L M 2013 (1) SACR 188 (WCC) at [64]; S v F M 2013 (1) SACR 51 (GNP) and S v Sekoere 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB) at [28.2] and [10] Du Toit, Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act at 30 - 9 are in favour of an interpretation that favours the constitu......
  • S v Speelman
    • South Africa
    • Eastern Cape Division
    • 31 August 2020
    ...p10 Rugunanan J I agree. It is so ordered. G. H. BLOEM JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT [1] Act No. 75 of 2008, as amended [2] See S v Sekoere 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB) which laid down that all matters falling within the provisions of s 85(1) of the CJA must be referred to the High Court for automatic ......
2 books & journal articles
  • 2015 index
    • South Africa
    • South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...36-7, 137S v Sehoole 2015 (2) SACR 196 (SCA) ................................................ 387-9S v Sekoere 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB)................................................... 57S v Sethoga 1990 (1) SA 270 (A) ......................................................... 243S v Shaik 2......
  • Diversion in the South African criminal justice system: Emerging jurisprudence
    • South Africa
    • South African Criminal Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 24 May 2019
    ...at para [28].98 S v Arends supra (n93) at paras [28] and [36].99 S v Arends supra (n93) at paras [37] – [38].100 Section 59(1)(b).101 2013 (2) SACR 426 (FB).102 S v Sekoere supr a (n101) at para [3].103 S v Sekoere supr a (n101) at para [4].104 S v Sekoere s upra (n101) at para [12].Diversi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT