S v Olyn

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeHiemstra J
Judgment Date24 November 1981
Citation1982 (3) SA 31 (B)
Hearing Date24 November 1981
CourtBophuthatswana Supreme Court

Hiemstra CJ:

The accused was found guilty of assault with intent to do A grievous bodily harm, and was sentenced to six months' imprisonment. It is a bad case of assault, because the complainant was struck in the face with a tomahawk. The accused first used an iron rod, was dispossessed of it, and then took the tomahawk.

The accused has two previous convictions for assault with intent. The previous one was in 1979 and on that occasion a sentence of six months' B imprisonment was imposed, wholly suspended for three years. He broke the condition of suspension by committing another assault with a dangerous weapon.

The magistrate put the suspended sentence into operation but ordered it to run concurrently with the six months imposed by him for the renewed offence. On a query he says he did not want to lay a term of 12 months C on the accused, who is still 'a very young man, aged only 24 years'. This young man began his career of crime in 1969, when he was 12. Twice in that year he was sentenced to strokes for theft, and this is his third conviction for assault.

The meaning of suspended sentences disappears if they are not put into D operation, in a case like this, where the condition was flagrantly breached. The people already believe that when a person gets a suspended sentence he is not punished at all, and a decision like this confirms that erroneous belief.

It is important to bear in mind that the court has a discretion whether E to put a suspended sentence into operation or not. One gets cases where it would be harsh to put it into operation. The condition of suspension might be breached only very slightly, for instance by way of an insignificant assault like a smack in the face. Or the renewed offence could be committed right at the end of a long suspension term like five years. The court might then justifiably think it is 'hard lines' to put F the suspended sentence into operation. If a magistrate thinks it would be too harsh to put a suspended sentence into operation, he can follow one of three courses:

(i...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • South African Railways and Harbours v Chairman, Bophuthatswana Central Road Transportation Board and Another; South African Transport Services v Chairman, Bophuthatswana Central Road Transportation Board and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...be set aside. In any case, the relief claimable and grantable by a Court in these applications is not mandatory against the company 1982 (3) SA p31 Steenkamp although, if the relief claimed is granted, such an order will have the effect that certain rights will be taken away from the compan......
  • S v Gantsha
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...whether or not to put a suspended sentence into operation (see the use of the word 'may' in ss (7) and (9) of s 297 and S v Olyn 1982 (3) SA 31 G (B)). In this last-mentioned case Hiemstra CJ (as he then was) succinctly and aptly stated the following in regard to the exercise of this 'One g......
  • S v Maseti
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...law Callaghan v Klackers NO and Another 1975 (2) SA 258 (E): referred to F S v Gantsha 1990 (2) SACR 104 (Ck): referred to S v Olyn 1982 (3) SA 31 (B): referred Legislation cited Statutes The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, s 297: see Juta's Statutes of South Africa 2012/13 vol 1 at 2-41......
  • S v Gantsha
    • South Africa
    • Ciskei High Court
    • 15 December 1987
    ...whether or not to put a suspended sentence into operation (see the use of the word 'may' in ss (7) and (9) of s 297 and S v Olyn 1982 (3) SA 31 G (B)). In this last-mentioned case Hiemstra CJ (as he then was) succinctly and aptly stated the following in regard to the exercise of this 'One g......
4 cases
  • South African Railways and Harbours v Chairman, Bophuthatswana Central Road Transportation Board and Another; South African Transport Services v Chairman, Bophuthatswana Central Road Transportation Board and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...be set aside. In any case, the relief claimable and grantable by a Court in these applications is not mandatory against the company 1982 (3) SA p31 Steenkamp although, if the relief claimed is granted, such an order will have the effect that certain rights will be taken away from the compan......
  • S v Gantsha
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...whether or not to put a suspended sentence into operation (see the use of the word 'may' in ss (7) and (9) of s 297 and S v Olyn 1982 (3) SA 31 G (B)). In this last-mentioned case Hiemstra CJ (as he then was) succinctly and aptly stated the following in regard to the exercise of this 'One g......
  • S v Maseti
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...law Callaghan v Klackers NO and Another 1975 (2) SA 258 (E): referred to F S v Gantsha 1990 (2) SACR 104 (Ck): referred to S v Olyn 1982 (3) SA 31 (B): referred Legislation cited Statutes The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, s 297: see Juta's Statutes of South Africa 2012/13 vol 1 at 2-41......
  • S v Gantsha
    • South Africa
    • Ciskei High Court
    • 15 December 1987
    ...whether or not to put a suspended sentence into operation (see the use of the word 'may' in ss (7) and (9) of s 297 and S v Olyn 1982 (3) SA 31 G (B)). In this last-mentioned case Hiemstra CJ (as he then was) succinctly and aptly stated the following in regard to the exercise of this 'One g......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT