S v Hlolloane
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Jansen AR, Kotzé AR en Hoexter Wn AR |
| Judgment Date | 02 June 1980 |
| Citation | 1980 (3) SA 824 (A) |
| Hearing Date | 23 May 1980 |
| Court | Appellate Division |
Jansen, AR.:
Die appellant, sy jonger broer (Joseph) en 'n ander (Daniel Maruma) is in die Oranje-Vrystaat Provinsiale Afdeling gesamentlik verhoor F en skuldig bevind aan moord. Versagtende omstandighede is bevind aanwesig te wees in die geval van laasgenoemde twee - maar nie in die geval van die appellant nie. Hy is ter dood veroordeel. Met verlof van die Hof a quo kom hy in hoër beroep teen die bevinding en die doodvonnis.
In die loop van die nag Saterdag 25 Maart-Sondag 26 Maart 1978 is ene G Samson Nglokoto in die veld by Frisgewaagdplotte, in die distrik Kroonstad, om die lewe gebring. Hy het oa ernstige kopwonde opgedoen en 'n wond op die bors wat na...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
S v Safatsa and Others
...at 864 et seq ; S v Prins en 'n Ander 1977 (3) SA 807 (A) at 814H; S v Williams en Andere 1980 (1) SA 60 (A) at 63F; S v Hlolloane I 1980 (3) SA 824 (A); S v Felix 1980 (4) SA 604 (A) at 611E; S v Maxaba 1981 (1) SA 1148 (A) at 1156H; S v Sauls 1981 (3) SA 172 (A) at 179G - 180H; S v Lombaa......
-
S v Masuku and Others
...Court in which the trial Court had in effect given no reasons for its finding that no extenuating circumstances existed: S v Hlo/loane 1980 (3) SA 824 (A) and S v Ngoma 1984 (3) SA 666 (A) at 673. In neither of them, however, was s 146 referred to. In my view, where s 146 has not been compl......
-
S v Kalogoropoulos
...SA 1032 (A); R v Van der Walt 1952 (4) SA 382 (A); R v Huebsch 1953 (2) SA 561 (A); S v Immelman 1978 (3) SA 726 (A); S v Hlolloane 1980 (3) SA 824 (A); S v Nqoma 1984 (3) SA 666 (A); R v Manda 1951 (3) SA 158 (A); S v Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1097 (A); S v Van Vuuren F 1983 (1) SA 12 (A); S v ......
-
S v Ngoma
...the majority E finding on this issue. In this connection I would draw attention to the following remarks of JANSEN JA in S v Hlolloane 1980 (3) SA 824 (A), a case where the trial Court had also found no extenuating circumstances without giving reasons, at "Dit is onwenslik dat 'n Hof so sum......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
S v Safatsa and Others
...at 864 et seq ; S v Prins en 'n Ander 1977 (3) SA 807 (A) at 814H; S v Williams en Andere 1980 (1) SA 60 (A) at 63F; S v Hlolloane I 1980 (3) SA 824 (A); S v Felix 1980 (4) SA 604 (A) at 611E; S v Maxaba 1981 (1) SA 1148 (A) at 1156H; S v Sauls 1981 (3) SA 172 (A) at 179G - 180H; S v Lombaa......
-
S v Masuku and Others
...Court in which the trial Court had in effect given no reasons for its finding that no extenuating circumstances existed: S v Hlo/loane 1980 (3) SA 824 (A) and S v Ngoma 1984 (3) SA 666 (A) at 673. In neither of them, however, was s 146 referred to. In my view, where s 146 has not been compl......
-
S v Kalogoropoulos
...SA 1032 (A); R v Van der Walt 1952 (4) SA 382 (A); R v Huebsch 1953 (2) SA 561 (A); S v Immelman 1978 (3) SA 726 (A); S v Hlolloane 1980 (3) SA 824 (A); S v Nqoma 1984 (3) SA 666 (A); R v Manda 1951 (3) SA 158 (A); S v Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1097 (A); S v Van Vuuren F 1983 (1) SA 12 (A); S v ......
-
S v Ngoma
...the majority E finding on this issue. In this connection I would draw attention to the following remarks of JANSEN JA in S v Hlolloane 1980 (3) SA 824 (A), a case where the trial Court had also found no extenuating circumstances without giving reasons, at "Dit is onwenslik dat 'n Hof so sum......
Get Started for Free