S v EB
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
2011 index
...36-37S v E 1992 (2) SACR 625 (A) ........................................................................ 229S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) .............................................................. 69-70S v Edley 1970 (2) SA 223 (N) ...........................................................
-
S v Masoanganye and Others
...no consideration of convenience supports theirfurther prolongation.’’(This is also true where sentence is concerned.)’See also SvEB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) at 528e–529epara 5.The appeal on sentence in respect of all appellants must fail.On the recusal application[88] The appeal pertaining t......
-
2012 index
.................................. 414S v Eadie 2002 (1) SACR 663 (SCA) ..................................................... 444S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) ................................................. 107, 111, 182S v Elliot 1996 (2) SACR 531 (E) ............................................
-
S v Seedat
...(1997 (3) SA 341; [1997] 3 All SA 277; [1997] ZASCA 45): dictum at 5j – e applied S v De Jager 1965 (2) SA 612 (A): applied S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) ([2010] ZASCA 71): referred S v Heller 1971 (2) SA 29 (A): referred to F S v Hewitt [2016] ZASCA 100: compared S v Jaipal 2005 (1) SACR ......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
S v Masoanganye and Others
...no consideration of convenience supports theirfurther prolongation.’’(This is also true where sentence is concerned.)’See also SvEB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) at 528e–529epara 5.The appeal on sentence in respect of all appellants must fail.On the recusal application[88] The appeal pertaining t......
-
S v Seedat
...(1997 (3) SA 341; [1997] 3 All SA 277; [1997] ZASCA 45): dictum at 5j – e applied S v De Jager 1965 (2) SA 612 (A): applied S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) ([2010] ZASCA 71): referred S v Heller 1971 (2) SA 29 (A): referred to F S v Hewitt [2016] ZASCA 100: compared S v Jaipal 2005 (1) SACR ......
-
S v Asele
...(5) BCLR 622; [2006] ZACC 2): dicta at 69B – D applied F Paddock Motors (Pty) Ltd v Igesund 1976 (3) SA 16 (A): referred to S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA): referred to S v Jaftha 2010 (1) SACR 136 (SCA) ([2010] 1 All SA 403; [2009] ZASCA 117): referred to S v Karolia 2006 (2) SACR 75 (SCA) ......
-
S v Asele
...their further prolongation. '(This is also true where sentence is concerned.)' J Kgomo JP (Mamosebo AJ concurring) A See also S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) at 528e – 529e (para [19] Having regard to S v Malgas 2001 (1) SACR 469 (SCA) (2001 (2) SA 1222; [2001] 3 All SA 220; [2001] ZASCA 30)......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
2011 index
...36-37S v E 1992 (2) SACR 625 (A) ........................................................................ 229S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) .............................................................. 69-70S v Edley 1970 (2) SA 223 (N) ...........................................................
-
2012 index
.................................. 414S v Eadie 2002 (1) SACR 663 (SCA) ..................................................... 444S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) ................................................. 107, 111, 182S v Elliot 1996 (2) SACR 531 (E) ............................................
-
Punishment in the eyes of the Constitutional Court of South Africa: The relationship between punishment and the rights of an offender in the sentencing of primary caregivers of children
...at hand decide against incarceration.’ See para [24]. Some of the deci-sions in which M v S has been followed include S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA); S v GL 2010 (2) SACR 488 (WCC); S v Londe 2011 (1) SACR 377 (ECG) and S v Marais 2009 (1) SACR 299 (E).41 Terblanche op cit (n10) 197-198.42 ......
-
Recent Case: Criminal procedure
...(S v Louw 1990 (3) SA 116 (A) at 123H-I; S v Swanepoel (1983 (1) SA 434 (A) at 439F; S v Kwali 1967 (3) SA 193 (A) at 197F-H).In S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) the appellant, an adult woman aged 33 years, had pleaded guilt y to and been convicted of 67 counts of fraud for which she had rece......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 provisions
-
2011 index
...36-37S v E 1992 (2) SACR 625 (A) ........................................................................ 229S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) .............................................................. 69-70S v Edley 1970 (2) SA 223 (N) ...........................................................
-
S v Masoanganye and Others
...no consideration of convenience supports theirfurther prolongation.’’(This is also true where sentence is concerned.)’See also SvEB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) at 528e–529epara 5.The appeal on sentence in respect of all appellants must fail.On the recusal application[88] The appeal pertaining t......
-
2012 index
.................................. 414S v Eadie 2002 (1) SACR 663 (SCA) ..................................................... 444S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) ................................................. 107, 111, 182S v Elliot 1996 (2) SACR 531 (E) ............................................
-
S v Seedat
...(1997 (3) SA 341; [1997] 3 All SA 277; [1997] ZASCA 45): dictum at 5j – e applied S v De Jager 1965 (2) SA 612 (A): applied S v EB 2010 (2) SACR 524 (SCA) ([2010] ZASCA 71): referred S v Heller 1971 (2) SA 29 (A): referred to F S v Hewitt [2016] ZASCA 100: compared S v Jaipal 2005 (1) SACR ......
Request a trial to view additional results