Rhodesian Metals Ltd (In Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeVicsount Maugham, Lord Atkin, Lord Russell of Killowen, Lord Wright and Lord Porter
Judgment Date27 May 1940
CourtAppellate Division, Privy Council
Hearing Date27 May 1940
Citation1940 AD 432

Lord Atkin:

This is an appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the Union of South Africa who affirmed a decision of HUDSON, J., in the High Court of Southern Rhodesia, dismissing an appeal by the liquidator of the appellant company from an assessment to income tax in the sum of £146,000 for the year ending 31st March, 1936 The assessment was made under the provisions of the Ordinance of Southern Rhodesia No 20 of 1918 It is desirable to set out some of the sections of that Ordinance:-

"Sec 4 (1): There shall be charged, levied and collected throughout the Territory, subject to such conditions and to such exemptions and abatements as are hereinafter provided, an income tax, at the rate and calculated in the manner specified hereunder, in respect of any taxable income received by or accrued to or in favour of any person . . . .

Sec 5: For the purposes of this Chapter -

'gross income' means the total amount other than receipts or accruals proved by the taxpayer to be of a capital nature, received by or accrued to or in favour of any person in any year or period assessable under this Chapter from any source within the Territory or deemed to be within the Territory . . . .

an amount shall be deemed to be derived from a source within the Territory if it is received by or accrues to or in favour of any person ordinarily resident in the Colony or whose principal

place of business is situate therein or whose business is wholly or partly managed therefrom . . . .

'income' means the amount remaining of the gross income of any person for any such year or period after deducting therefrom any amounts exempt from income tax in the hands of such person:

'taxable income' means the amount remaining after deducting from the income of any person all the amounts other than abatements allowed as deductions under this Chapter;

Sec 10: Income shall be deemed to have accrued to any person from a source within the Territory, where it has been received by or has accrued to or in favour of such person by virtue of -

(1) any contract made within the Territory for the sale of goods, whether such goods have been delivered or are to be delivered in or out of the Territory;

(2) any service rendered or work or labour done in the carrying on in the Territory of any business, trade, profession or occupation . . . .

Sec 35: (12) (b) Where a non-resident person produces, grows, mines, creates, manufactures, fabricates, improves, packs, preserves or constructs in whole or in part anything within this Colony, and exports the same without sale prior to the export thereof, he shall be deemed to be carrying on business within this Colony and to have derived from a source within this Colony a proportionate part of any profit...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 practice notes
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Epstein
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...& Whaling Co., Ltd v C.I.R., 1939 AD 487; Rhodesia Metals Ltd (In 1954 (3) SA p691 Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes, 1938 AD 282; 1940 AD 432. Further still, the test or approach adopted in Sulley's case and the other cases, supra, does not accord with the principles laid down in C.I.R ......
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Lever Bros and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...shares on credit outside the Union and the resulting debt secured by the pledge in London (Rhodesia Metals, Ltd. v Commissioner of Taxes (1940 AD 432 at 436) Questions of jurisdiction and domicile have nothing to do with "source" (De Beer's Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v Howe (1906, A.C. 455 at......
  • Van Zyl NO v Commissioner for Inland Revenue
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...G Rhodesia Metals Ltd (in Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes 1938 AD 282 Rhodesia Metals Ltd (in Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes 1940 AD 432 Secretary for Inland Revenue v Smant 1973 (1) SA 754 (A) Thorne and Another NNO v Receiver of Revenue 1976 (2) SA 50 (C) Van Heerden and Anothe......
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Epstein
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the alleged test of where the capital has been D productively employed, Rhodesia Metals Ltd. (In Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes, 1940 AD 432. If the question of source is a question of fact, the Special Court found it to be the Argentine. Although not mentioned in the stated case, the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Epstein
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...& Whaling Co., Ltd v C.I.R., 1939 AD 487; Rhodesia Metals Ltd (In 1954 (3) SA p691 Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes, 1938 AD 282; 1940 AD 432. Further still, the test or approach adopted in Sulley's case and the other cases, supra, does not accord with the principles laid down in C.I.R ......
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Lever Bros and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...shares on credit outside the Union and the resulting debt secured by the pledge in London (Rhodesia Metals, Ltd. v Commissioner of Taxes (1940 AD 432 at 436) Questions of jurisdiction and domicile have nothing to do with "source" (De Beer's Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v Howe (1906, A.C. 455 at......
  • Van Zyl NO v Commissioner for Inland Revenue
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...G Rhodesia Metals Ltd (in Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes 1938 AD 282 Rhodesia Metals Ltd (in Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes 1940 AD 432 Secretary for Inland Revenue v Smant 1973 (1) SA 754 (A) Thorne and Another NNO v Receiver of Revenue 1976 (2) SA 50 (C) Van Heerden and Anothe......
  • Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Epstein
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the alleged test of where the capital has been D productively employed, Rhodesia Metals Ltd. (In Liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxes, 1940 AD 432. If the question of source is a question of fact, the Special Court found it to be the Argentine. Although not mentioned in the stated case, the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Source and the Remote Worker
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Business Tax and Company Law Quarterly No. 13-1, March 2022
    • 1 March 2022
    ...to his attention…’ unless immaterial to the company. 8 Section 73(3) of the Companies Act. 9 Rhodesian Metals (in liquidation) v COT 1940 AD 432, 11 SATC 244. The source may also include the taking of legal responsibility for the affairs of the company but 4Volume 13 • Issue 1 • march 2022......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT