Rex v Sitebe
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Stratford ACJ, Beyers JA, De Villiers JA and Gardiner AJA |
| Judgment Date | 13 October 1933 |
| Hearing Date | 13 October 1933 |
| Court | Appellate Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
Rex v Foord
...cf. Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Swanepoel (1945 AD 444); Rex v Mahametsa (1941 AD 83); Rex v Sitebe (1934 AD 56). A. J. Smit, K.C., for the Crown: The verdict on count one is not bad for duplicity; sec. 12 of Act 12 of 1942 creates one offence, but provide......
-
Rex v Wildauer
...that the accused had connection with her at his house. The district surgeon, who examined her, gave evidence of appearances of recent 1934 AD p56 Gardiner, connection. A Mrs. Stevens, who came to the house at the time when the offence is alleged to have been committed, said that she found t......
-
R v Mkabels
...R v Nxumalo, 1958 (2) P.H. H.282 (N)). It would seem that sec. 333 (2) of Act 56 of 1955 only applies to E imprisonment (cf. Rex v Sitebe, 1934 AD 56) and that strokes cannot be ordered to run In the circumstances the above mentioned sentences are set aside and the matter remitted to the ma......
-
S v Jeffries
...years. See Section 342(2) of Act 31of 1917 and Section 333(2) of Act 56 of 1955. [5] See S v Mngadi 1991 (1) SACR 313 (T) at 315 b-g. [6] 1934 AD 56 at 58. The section under consideration was section 342 (2) of Act 31 of [7] Rex v Kubheka 1943 NPD 57. [8] 1933 T.P.D 5 at page 8 [9] 1990 (1)......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Rex v Foord
...cf. Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Swanepoel (1945 AD 444); Rex v Mahametsa (1941 AD 83); Rex v Sitebe (1934 AD 56). A. J. Smit, K.C., for the Crown: The verdict on count one is not bad for duplicity; sec. 12 of Act 12 of 1942 creates one offence, but provide......
-
Rex v Wildauer
...that the accused had connection with her at his house. The district surgeon, who examined her, gave evidence of appearances of recent 1934 AD p56 Gardiner, connection. A Mrs. Stevens, who came to the house at the time when the offence is alleged to have been committed, said that she found t......
-
R v Mkabels
...R v Nxumalo, 1958 (2) P.H. H.282 (N)). It would seem that sec. 333 (2) of Act 56 of 1955 only applies to E imprisonment (cf. Rex v Sitebe, 1934 AD 56) and that strokes cannot be ordered to run In the circumstances the above mentioned sentences are set aside and the matter remitted to the ma......
-
S v Jeffries
...years. See Section 342(2) of Act 31of 1917 and Section 333(2) of Act 56 of 1955. [5] See S v Mngadi 1991 (1) SACR 313 (T) at 315 b-g. [6] 1934 AD 56 at 58. The section under consideration was section 342 (2) of Act 31 of [7] Rex v Kubheka 1943 NPD 57. [8] 1933 T.P.D 5 at page 8 [9] 1990 (1)......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 provisions
-
Rex v Foord
...cf. Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Swanepoel (1945 AD 444); Rex v Mahametsa (1941 AD 83); Rex v Sitebe (1934 AD 56). A. J. Smit, K.C., for the Crown: The verdict on count one is not bad for duplicity; sec. 12 of Act 12 of 1942 creates one offence, but provide......
-
Rex v Wildauer
...that the accused had connection with her at his house. The district surgeon, who examined her, gave evidence of appearances of recent 1934 AD p56 Gardiner, connection. A Mrs. Stevens, who came to the house at the time when the offence is alleged to have been committed, said that she found t......
-
R v Mkabels
...R v Nxumalo, 1958 (2) P.H. H.282 (N)). It would seem that sec. 333 (2) of Act 56 of 1955 only applies to E imprisonment (cf. Rex v Sitebe, 1934 AD 56) and that strokes cannot be ordered to run In the circumstances the above mentioned sentences are set aside and the matter remitted to the ma......
-
S v Jeffries
...years. See Section 342(2) of Act 31of 1917 and Section 333(2) of Act 56 of 1955. [5] See S v Mngadi 1991 (1) SACR 313 (T) at 315 b-g. [6] 1934 AD 56 at 58. The section under consideration was section 342 (2) of Act 31 of [7] Rex v Kubheka 1943 NPD 57. [8] 1933 T.P.D 5 at page 8 [9] 1990 (1)......
Request a trial to view additional results