Rex v Shein

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeInnes CJ, Solomon JA, De Villiers JA, Kotzé JA and Wessels JA
Judgment Date03 October 1924
Hearing Date15 September 1924
CourtAppellate Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
93 practice notes
  • S v Ndhlovu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...G R v Masemang 1950 (2) SA 488 (A) at 494 - 5 R v Mthembu 1950 (1) SA 670 (A) R v Sang [1980] AC 402 (HL) ([1979] 2 All ER 1222) R v Shein 1925 AD 6 R v Tusini and Another 1953 (4) SA 406 (A) at 414 H S v Forbes 1970 (2) SA 594 (C) at 600A - C S v Hadebe 1998 (1) SACR 422 (T) S v January; P......
  • S v Ndhlovu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...R v Masemang 1950 (2) SA 488 (A) at 494 - 5 R v Mthembu 1950 (1) SA 670 (A) R v Sang [1980] AC 402 (HL) ([1979] 2 All ER E 1222) R v Shein 1925 AD 6 R v Tusini and Another 1953 (4) SA 406 (A) at 414 S v Forbes 1970 (2) SA 594 (C) at 600A - C S v Hadebe 1998 (1) SACR 422 (T) S v January; Pro......
  • Rex v Kalogeropoulos
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to convict, that was a point of law proper to be reserved under sec. 372. Such a reservation was considered by this Court in Rex v Shein (1925 AD p. 6), where it was laid down that the evidence on which a jury is entitled to convict is evidence on which reasonable men could properly convict......
  • Rex v Linder and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...reserved, the verdict is not so unreasonable that the trial Court cannot be considered to have discharged its duty judicially; Rex v Shein (1925 AD 6, at 9); Rex v Difford (1937, A.D., at 370); Rex v Tshabangu (1934, A.D., at 519); Rex v Cilliers (1937 AD 278, at 288); Rex v du Plessis (194......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
91 cases
  • Rex v Noorbhai
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...See Rex v Kalogeropoulos (1945 AD 38), Rex v Bakeer (1945 AD 55). There is no reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding - Rex v Shein (1925 AD 6); Rex v Tshabangu (1934,. AD 514 at p. 516); Rex v Sebeso and Others (supra at p. 196). The witness Amos is not an accomplice. Rex v Mlooi (192......
  • S v Ndhlovu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...G R v Masemang 1950 (2) SA 488 (A) at 494 - 5 R v Mthembu 1950 (1) SA 670 (A) R v Sang [1980] AC 402 (HL) ([1979] 2 All ER 1222) R v Shein 1925 AD 6 R v Tusini and Another 1953 (4) SA 406 (A) at 414 H S v Forbes 1970 (2) SA 594 (C) at 600A - C S v Hadebe 1998 (1) SACR 422 (T) S v January; P......
  • S v Ndhlovu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...R v Masemang 1950 (2) SA 488 (A) at 494 - 5 R v Mthembu 1950 (1) SA 670 (A) R v Sang [1980] AC 402 (HL) ([1979] 2 All ER E 1222) R v Shein 1925 AD 6 R v Tusini and Another 1953 (4) SA 406 (A) at 414 S v Forbes 1970 (2) SA 594 (C) at 600A - C S v Hadebe 1998 (1) SACR 422 (T) S v January; Pro......
  • Rex v Kalogeropoulos
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to convict, that was a point of law proper to be reserved under sec. 372. Such a reservation was considered by this Court in Rex v Shein (1925 AD p. 6), where it was laid down that the evidence on which a jury is entitled to convict is evidence on which reasonable men could properly convict......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act : is it time for its abolition?
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet De Jure No. 51-2, December 2018
    • 1 Diciembre 2018
    ...obviously political nor did it coincide with a drastic changeto the bench at the time, nor did it follow legislative changes.13 R v Shein 1925 AD 6 (W). Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act: Is it time for its abolition? 255interpretation is perhaps the only aspect of the section 174 p......
  • Fraudulent Insurance Claims
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , September 2019
    • 3 Septiembre 2019
    ...(0).) Accordingly, where the property set on fire belongs to another, it does not matter whether or not the owner is insured (see R v Shein 1925 AD 6 at 12), nor is it necessary to enquire whether there was any intent to fraudulently obtain an insurance payment (see R v Hoffman (1906) 2 Buc......
93 provisions
  • Rex v Noorbhai
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...See Rex v Kalogeropoulos (1945 AD 38), Rex v Bakeer (1945 AD 55). There is no reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding - Rex v Shein (1925 AD 6); Rex v Tshabangu (1934,. AD 514 at p. 516); Rex v Sebeso and Others (supra at p. 196). The witness Amos is not an accomplice. Rex v Mlooi (192......
  • S v Ndhlovu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...G R v Masemang 1950 (2) SA 488 (A) at 494 - 5 R v Mthembu 1950 (1) SA 670 (A) R v Sang [1980] AC 402 (HL) ([1979] 2 All ER 1222) R v Shein 1925 AD 6 R v Tusini and Another 1953 (4) SA 406 (A) at 414 H S v Forbes 1970 (2) SA 594 (C) at 600A - C S v Hadebe 1998 (1) SACR 422 (T) S v January; P......
  • S v Ndhlovu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...R v Masemang 1950 (2) SA 488 (A) at 494 - 5 R v Mthembu 1950 (1) SA 670 (A) R v Sang [1980] AC 402 (HL) ([1979] 2 All ER E 1222) R v Shein 1925 AD 6 R v Tusini and Another 1953 (4) SA 406 (A) at 414 S v Forbes 1970 (2) SA 594 (C) at 600A - C S v Hadebe 1998 (1) SACR 422 (T) S v January; Pro......
  • Rex v Kalogeropoulos
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to convict, that was a point of law proper to be reserved under sec. 372. Such a reservation was considered by this Court in Rex v Shein (1925 AD p. 6), where it was laid down that the evidence on which a jury is entitled to convict is evidence on which reasonable men could properly convict......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT