Rex v Krasner
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
S v Malinde and Others
...Liquor Licensing Board 1954 (3) SA 232 (C) at 240A - E; Jabaar v Minister of the Interior 1958 (4) SA 107 (T) at 114B - D; R v Krasner 1950 (2) SA 475 (A) and a number of English decisions cited therein; R v Venter 1944 AD 359 at 362; Mcunun v R 1938 NLR 229; Kruger v Ludick 1947 (3) SA 23 ......
-
S v Malindi and Others
...Ch 345; Stead v State Government Insurance Commission 1986 ALJR 662; Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [1984] 3 All ER 201 (PC); R v Krasner 1950 (2) SA 475 (A); R v C Venter 1944 AD 359; Mcunu v R 1938 NLR 229; Kruger v Ludick 1947 (3) SA 23 (A); Newell v Cronje 1985 (4) SA 692 (E); Dedlow v Min......
-
S v Baleka and Others (4)
...case of a jury is analogous. Members of a jury could not give evidence to prove what had been discussed in a jury room: R v Krasner 1950 (2) SA 475 (A) at 480 - 5. The Appellate Division here referred to B inter alia Ellis v Deheer [1922] 2 KB 113 ([1922] All ER Rep 451) at 121 and Ras Beha......
-
R v Behrman
...R v Saffy and Bennett, 1944 AD 391; R v Patel, 1946 AD 903; R v Kirsten, 1950 (3) SA 659; R v H., 1948 (4) SA 154; R v Krasner, 1950 (2) SA 475; R v Bezuidenhout, 1954 (3) SA 188. Where there is E an irregularity, the onus is on the Crown to show that despite it a reasonable Court would ine......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
S v Malindi and Others
...Ch 345; Stead v State Government Insurance Commission 1986 ALJR 662; Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [1984] 3 All ER 201 (PC); R v Krasner 1950 (2) SA 475 (A); R v C Venter 1944 AD 359; Mcunu v R 1938 NLR 229; Kruger v Ludick 1947 (3) SA 23 (A); Newell v Cronje 1985 (4) SA 692 (E); Dedlow v Min......
-
S v Malinde and Others
...Liquor Licensing Board 1954 (3) SA 232 (C) at 240A - E; Jabaar v Minister of the Interior 1958 (4) SA 107 (T) at 114B - D; R v Krasner 1950 (2) SA 475 (A) and a number of English decisions cited therein; R v Venter 1944 AD 359 at 362; Mcunun v R 1938 NLR 229; Kruger v Ludick 1947 (3) SA 23 ......
-
S v Baleka and Others (4)
...case of a jury is analogous. Members of a jury could not give evidence to prove what had been discussed in a jury room: R v Krasner 1950 (2) SA 475 (A) at 480 - 5. The Appellate Division here referred to B inter alia Ellis v Deheer [1922] 2 KB 113 ([1922] All ER Rep 451) at 121 and Ras Beha......
-
R v Behrman
...R v Saffy and Bennett, 1944 AD 391; R v Patel, 1946 AD 903; R v Kirsten, 1950 (3) SA 659; R v H., 1948 (4) SA 154; R v Krasner, 1950 (2) SA 475; R v Bezuidenhout, 1954 (3) SA 188. Where there is E an irregularity, the onus is on the Crown to show that despite it a reasonable Court would ine......
Request a trial to view additional results