Rex v Coetzee

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeStratford ACJ, Beyers JA, De Villiers JA and Tindall AJA
Judgment Date01 September 1936
Citation1936 AD 471
Hearing Date01 September 1936
CourtAppellate Division

Rex Respondent v Coetzee Applicant
1936 AD 471

1936 AD p471


Citation

1936 AD 471

Court

Appellate Division

Judge

Stratford ACJ, Beyers JA, De Villiers JA and Tindall AJA

Heard

September 1, 1936

Judgment

September 1, 1936

Flynote : Sleutelwoorde

Criminal procedure — Appeal — From Magistrate's Court to Appellate Division — Leave to appeal against sentence — When granted.

Headnote : Kopnota

The Appellate Division will not grant leave to appeal in a criminal case from a magistrate's court when the sole ground of appeal is that the sentence was excessive unless the Court is satisfied that no reasonable man ought to have imposed such sentence or that there are circumstances bearing on the matter which the magistrate failed to consider or that he followed a wrong principle in imposing the sentence or exceeded the powers conferred upon him by the Legislature.

1936 AD p472

Case Information

Application for leave to appeal from a decision of the Transvaal Provincial Division (GREENBERG, J and SOLOMON, J.) dismissing an appeal from a conviction in the magistrate's court of Johannesburg. The accused had been found guilty of acquiring unwrought precious metal in contravention of sec. 113 of Act 35 of 1908 (Transvaal) on two counts. He was sentenced to three months imprisonment and a fine of £50 or, in...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
27 practice notes
  • Rex v Kalogeropoulos
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...should also be granted to appeal against the sentence, which was assessed on a wrong basis, Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Ex parte Minister of Justice: In re Rex v Berger (1936 AD Lutge, K.C., was not called upon to reply on the merits. Cur adv vult. Postea (Octob......
  • Rex v Patz
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...41); Wills (supra, p. 103); Kenny (supra, p. 253); Wharton (supra). The sentence was not excessive; Rex v Neal (1945 AD 1); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471). Banks, in Cur. adv. vult. Postea (October 22nd). Judgment Watermeyer, C.J.: This case comes before this Court on certain points of law, re......
  • Rex v Zulu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...persisted for many years and was oft repeated by, I think, all the Courts, including the Appellate Division, A cf. Rex v Coetzee, 1936 AD 471 at p. 472, and was approved in Rex v Ford, 1939 AD 559 at p. 560. In 1922, however, in Rex v Myburgh, 1922 AD 249, which was an appeal from the decis......
  • Rex v Nxumalo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Wessels has been referred to in several subsequent cases, e.g. Rex v Mahomed (1934 AD 511), Rex v van Rooyen (1935 AD 323), Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471), and either approved or at any rate not dissented from. The language used in Rex v Wessels seems to suggest that the Court hearing an appli......
  • Get Started for Free
27 cases
  • Rex v Kalogeropoulos
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...should also be granted to appeal against the sentence, which was assessed on a wrong basis, Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Ex parte Minister of Justice: In re Rex v Berger (1936 AD Lutge, K.C., was not called upon to reply on the merits. Cur adv vult. Postea (Octob......
  • Rex v Patz
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...41); Wills (supra, p. 103); Kenny (supra, p. 253); Wharton (supra). The sentence was not excessive; Rex v Neal (1945 AD 1); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471). Banks, in Cur. adv. vult. Postea (October 22nd). Judgment Watermeyer, C.J.: This case comes before this Court on certain points of law, re......
  • Rex v Zulu and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...persisted for many years and was oft repeated by, I think, all the Courts, including the Appellate Division, A cf. Rex v Coetzee, 1936 AD 471 at p. 472, and was approved in Rex v Ford, 1939 AD 559 at p. 560. In 1922, however, in Rex v Myburgh, 1922 AD 249, which was an appeal from the decis......
  • Rex v Nxumalo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Wessels has been referred to in several subsequent cases, e.g. Rex v Mahomed (1934 AD 511), Rex v van Rooyen (1935 AD 323), Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471), and either approved or at any rate not dissented from. The language used in Rex v Wessels seems to suggest that the Court hearing an appli......
  • Get Started for Free