Rex v Coetzee
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Judge | Stratford ACJ, Beyers JA, De Villiers JA and Tindall AJA |
Judgment Date | 01 September 1936 |
Citation | 1936 AD 471 |
Hearing Date | 01 September 1936 |
Court | Appellate Division |
Rex Respondent v Coetzee Applicant
1936 AD 471
1936 AD p471
Citation | 1936 AD 471 |
Court | Appellate Division |
Judge | Stratford ACJ, Beyers JA, De Villiers JA and Tindall AJA |
Heard | September 1, 1936 |
Judgment | September 1, 1936 |
Flynote : Sleutelwoorde
Criminal procedure — Appeal — From Magistrate's Court to Appellate Division — Leave to appeal against sentence — When granted.
Headnote : Kopnota
The Appellate Division will not grant leave to appeal in a criminal case from a magistrate's court when the sole ground of appeal is that the sentence was excessive unless the Court is satisfied that no reasonable man ought to have imposed such sentence or that there are circumstances bearing on the matter which the magistrate failed to consider or that he followed a wrong principle in imposing the sentence or exceeded the powers conferred upon him by the Legislature.
1936 AD p472
Case Information
Application for leave to appeal from a decision of the Transvaal Provincial Division (GREENBERG, J and SOLOMON, J.) dismissing an appeal from a conviction in the magistrate's court of Johannesburg. The accused had been found guilty of acquiring unwrought precious metal in contravention of sec. 113 of Act 35 of 1908 (Transvaal) on two counts. He was sentenced to three months imprisonment and a fine of £50 or, in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Rex v Kalogeropoulos
...should also be granted to appeal against the sentence, which was assessed on a wrong basis, Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Ex parte Minister of Justice: In re Rex v Berger (1936 AD Lutge, K.C., was not called upon to reply on the merits. Cur adv vult. Postea (Octob......
-
Rex v Patz
...41); Wills (supra, p. 103); Kenny (supra, p. 253); Wharton (supra). The sentence was not excessive; Rex v Neal (1945 AD 1); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471). Banks, in Cur. adv. vult. Postea (October 22nd). Judgment Watermeyer, C.J.: This case comes before this Court on certain points of law, re......
-
Rex v Zulu and Others
...persisted for many years and was oft repeated by, I think, all the Courts, including the Appellate Division, A cf. Rex v Coetzee, 1936 AD 471 at p. 472, and was approved in Rex v Ford, 1939 AD 559 at p. 560. In 1922, however, in Rex v Myburgh, 1922 AD 249, which was an appeal from the decis......
-
Rex v Nxumalo
...Wessels has been referred to in several subsequent cases, e.g. Rex v Mahomed (1934 AD 511), Rex v van Rooyen (1935 AD 323), Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471), and either approved or at any rate not dissented from. The language used in Rex v Wessels seems to suggest that the Court hearing an appli......
-
Rex v Kalogeropoulos
...should also be granted to appeal against the sentence, which was assessed on a wrong basis, Rex v Sandig (1937 AD 296); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471); Ex parte Minister of Justice: In re Rex v Berger (1936 AD Lutge, K.C., was not called upon to reply on the merits. Cur adv vult. Postea (Octob......
-
Rex v Patz
...41); Wills (supra, p. 103); Kenny (supra, p. 253); Wharton (supra). The sentence was not excessive; Rex v Neal (1945 AD 1); Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471). Banks, in Cur. adv. vult. Postea (October 22nd). Judgment Watermeyer, C.J.: This case comes before this Court on certain points of law, re......
-
Rex v Zulu and Others
...persisted for many years and was oft repeated by, I think, all the Courts, including the Appellate Division, A cf. Rex v Coetzee, 1936 AD 471 at p. 472, and was approved in Rex v Ford, 1939 AD 559 at p. 560. In 1922, however, in Rex v Myburgh, 1922 AD 249, which was an appeal from the decis......
-
Rex v Nxumalo
...Wessels has been referred to in several subsequent cases, e.g. Rex v Mahomed (1934 AD 511), Rex v van Rooyen (1935 AD 323), Rex v Coetzee (1936 AD 471), and either approved or at any rate not dissented from. The language used in Rex v Wessels seems to suggest that the Court hearing an appli......