Redemption versus repurchase of shares : further observations

Date01 December 2018
Published date01 December 2018
DOI10.10520/EJC-134849dbe6
Pages7-12
AuthorAlbertus Marais
Record Numberbtclq_v9_n4_a3
7
© Siber ink
Redemption versus
Repurchase of Shares:
FURTHER OBSERVATIONS
ALBERTUS MARAIS*
ABSTRACT
In ITC 1859 74 SATC 213 Coppin J considered whether a share redemp-
tion amounts to a transfer of rights from a shareholder to the share issuing
company. Ever since the obiter comments made in that case on the position of
share repurchase (as opposed to a redemption), there has been much specu-
lation whether a share buyback strictly speaking involves the transfer of rights
from a shareholder back to a company.
The June 2018 Edition of the BTCLQ sought to reignite that debate. This
article adds further comments to the subject, and explores whether a share
redemption and share buyback achieve different results. The conclusion is
that, while the process to achieve a share buyback vis-à-vis a redemption
differs, the effect of both is the same. In neither instance is there a disposal
of rights by the shareholder ‘to’ the company. This is because a shareholder
holds personal rights against the company (embodied collectively by the
share held) as opposed to real rights. Personal rights, while being transfer-
able, are not transmissible.
It is interesting that the Companies Act 71 of 2008, while prescribing the
process to be followed, is silent on when shares will be considered to be
‘repurchased’ as opposed to being redeemed. This article ventures to suggest
what the difference between a redemption and a repurchase is.
Introduction
This journal considered in its June 2018 edition the differences between
a redemption of shares vis-à-vis a share buy-back.1 It was concluded that
there is a distinct difference between a redemption of shares on the one
hand, and a buyback of shares on the other. As authority for this proposi-
tion it cites the fact that section 48 of the Companies Act,2 which deals
with share repurchases, expressly excludes from its ambit share redemp-
tions. It further refers to the example of BCR044 which suggests that SARS
agrees that such a distinction exists.3
1
* Director: AJM Tax.
Nortje, L., ‘Hybrid Equity Instruments: Redemption versus Repurchase’ BTCLQ
9(2) at 9.
2
71 of 2008.
3
Nortje above.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT