Recent Developments: Recent developments in Corporate law: Part 2

JurisdictionSouth Africa
AuthorStephanie Luiz
Citation(2000) 12 SA Merc LJ 13
Pages13-24
Published date03 September 2019
Date03 September 2019
Recent Developments in Corporate Law:
Part 2
STEPHANIE LUIZ
University of South Africa
1 Introduction
Nobody ever thought that company law was fast moving. The odd
intellectual issue here and there maybe, but nothing much changed.
Textbooks could last for a good few years. However, the last two years
have seen a number of major and minor amendments to the Companies
Act 61 of 1973 ('the Companies Act'). These changes present new
challenges. For the company-law academic, it means something new to
analyse and criticize. For the lecturer, it means new lecture notes, more
tutorial letters and new study guides. For the student, it means discarding
some of last years notes, coming to grips with the new stuff and throwing
out the old exam papers and model answers. For the company-law
practitioner, it means getting a quick overview of the changes, ignoring
what is irrelevant to your practice and deciding what you need to
consider further. Although some of the minor amendments are referred
to in this analysis, it concentrates mainly on dispositions under s 228; the
disclosure of beneficial interests in listed securities; mandatory offers
under the Securities Regulation Code on Takeovers and Mergers; and the
appointment of a company secretary.
2 Insider Trading
One of the major changes in company law in 1998 concerned the issue
of insider trading. Not content with the lack of success in trapping
wrongdoers in the net of insider-trading legislation when it was contained
in the Companies Act, the Legislature came up with an entire statute
devoted to the issue, the Insider Trading Act 135 of 1998. New offences
were created, the potential of civil liability seriously enhanced, and the
Financial Services Board was put at the helm (for a consideration of
the new statute, see SM Luiz 'Insider Trading Regulation — If at First
You Don't Succeed . . .' (1999) 11
SA Merc LJ
136).
3 Dispositions under Section 228
A further change which occurred in 1999 and which has led to a new
rule in the Securities Regulation Code on Takeovers and Mergers ('the
Code') concerns transactions which constitute a disposal of the major
portion of a company's assets or undertaking under s 228 of the
Companies Act. After having been convinced that minority shareholders
are sometimes prejudiced by the sale of a major portion of the company's
13
(2000) 12 SA Merc LJ 13
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT