Recent Case: Specific crimes

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Pages373-380
Date24 May 2019
Citation(2002) 15 SACJ 373
Published date24 May 2019
AuthorRonald Louw
RECENT CASES • VONNISSE
Specific Crimes
RONALD LOUW
University of Natal, Durban
In
S v Bresler
2002 (2) SACR 18 (C) the accused and his 18-year-old daughter
were charged with contempt of court in that they had made certain racist and
derogatory remarks about the judiciary and the administration of justice in
various court documents over a period of two years. The accused's daughter
had been convicted and fined for exceeding the road traffic speed limit by
magistrate Mr NJ Koeries, a 'coloured' magistrate in the Bellville magistrate's
court. She had stated in her defence that it was late at night and that her
father had warned her to be aware of being followed by 'black people'. She
thought that she was being followed and so she tried to escape by speeding
away. At the time she was stopped by the traffic officers, she did not tell them
that she was trying to escape from the other vehicle she believed was in
pursuit of her (at 22f-i). From then on, over a period of two years, under the
direction, or more probably the control, of her father, the daughter lodged an
appeal in which she filed several affidavits and wrote several letters. It was
conceded by the father that he had written all the documents and had his
daughter sign blank pages before he drafted the documents. The daughter
was accordingly acquitted, but not without the following stern warning by
Satchwell J (at 23i-24a):
`You allowed your name to be used and you permitted your signature to adorn a
document written under your name. You further participated in this process by
attending at the magistrate's court and asking for leave to appeal and you appeared
in the High Court to argue that appeal. Your carelessness or timidity in the face of
your father's intransigence has cost you dearly in time, possibly in anxiety, certainly
now in humiliation and it could cost you a lot more. Your name has been
associated with a racist attack on an individual, on judicial officers generally, on the
administration of justice and on the very foundation of our democracy.'
In summary, the documents and letters referred to such notions as
Africanised bush law, insane verdicts, anarchy in the new African
democracy, incompetence and lack of objectivity with regard to members
373
(2002) 15 SACJ 373
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT