Recent Case: Illegal gambling

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Date11 September 2019
Published date11 September 2019
AuthorMarita Carnelley
Pages277-290
Citation(2019) 32 SACJ 277
Illegal Gambling
MARITA CARNELLEY
North-West University
1 Background
Illegal gambling as a topic has featured in t he SACJ recent cases updates:
2004 (1) 79-86; 2010 (3) 439-453 and 2013 (3) 429-446. T he rst part of
the present overview deals with judgments repor ted since 2014, and
in many respects these case s seem to be just another manifestation
of a larger Stalingrad delaying str ategy to use litigation and appeals
to allow unlicensed operators to continue generating resources unti l
the enforcers get their act together. The enforcement problems with
search warrants have resulted in so much fr ustration on the side of
licensed operators that they are tur ning to the courts themselves to
interdict illegal operators, to stop the un licensed operations that seem
to continue with impunity. This aspect is d iscussed in the second
section. The third sec tion places the litigation in a broader historical
context, and, lastly, an overview is given of new proposals to rectif y
the current unsatisfactor y situation.
The regulation of lawful ga mbling opportunities in Sout h Africa is
in theory based on a system of li mited legalisation and strict regulation
(Preamble of the National Gambling Act 7 of 200 4). Provision of, and
participating in, unl icensed gambling opportunities i n the country is
illegal and a crimi nal offence (s 7 of the National Gambling Act).
There are two main ki nds of illegal gambling. Firstly there is la nd-
based, casino-like gambl ing operated without the necessary licence, and
often called internet cafés or enter tainment lounges, but also included
are unlicensed slot machines, bet ting on lotteries, greyhound and bush
(dog) racing, fahfee ( fa) a nd dice (National Gambling Policy 2 016,
GG 39887, GN 389, 1 April 2016 at 4.5.1 and 4.5.4). The prevalence of
the various types of il legal gambling dif fers from province to province,
although the full extent thereof i s unclear (National Gambling Board
Socio-Economic Impact of Illegal and Online Gambling in South Africa
Report (hereina fter Online Gambling Report) (2016) Table 2-1). There is
legal uncertainty about the legal ity of traditional licensed games s uch
as bingo being moved to electronic platforms, but this complication
is not discussed here (see National Gambling Policy 4.3.1; S Louw
and V Bronstein ‘Bingosinos, concurrent competence and functiona l
federalism in South Af rica’ (2018) 135 SALJ 5 47-5 71).
Recent Cases 277
(2019) 32 SACJ 277
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT