Raliphaswa v Mugivhi and Others
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Citation | 2008 (4) SA 154 (SCA) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Tinto v Minister of Police
...appliedNdabeni v Minister of Law and Order and Another 1984 (3) SA 500 (D):dictum at 511D–E appliedRaliphaswa v Mugivhi and Others 2008 (4) SA 154 (SCA): comparedRyan v Petrus 2010 (1) SA 169 (ECG): comparedSigwebedlana v Minister of Police 1998 JDR 0018 (TkH): distinguishedThint (Pty) Ltd ......
-
Shapiro v South African Recording Rights Association Ltd (Galeta Intervening)
...Galeta is entitled to succeed in the application for intervention. [24] SARRAL, by its opposition, has caused what should have been a H 2008 (4) SA p154 A Gautschi A relatively simple application to grow to unnecessary proportions (over 500 pages), and its opposition was in my view unreason......
-
BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Finlay
...me to drawing a negative inference. See Brand v Minister of Justice 1959 (4) SA 712 (A) 715F-716F; Raliphaswa v Mugivhi and others 2008 (4) SA 154 (SCA) at para [15] on 157I-158A Snyders AJA states the "When a witness is equally available to both parties, but not called to give evidence, it......
3 cases
-
Tinto v Minister of Police
...appliedNdabeni v Minister of Law and Order and Another 1984 (3) SA 500 (D):dictum at 511D–E appliedRaliphaswa v Mugivhi and Others 2008 (4) SA 154 (SCA): comparedRyan v Petrus 2010 (1) SA 169 (ECG): comparedSigwebedlana v Minister of Police 1998 JDR 0018 (TkH): distinguishedThint (Pty) Ltd ......
-
Shapiro v South African Recording Rights Association Ltd (Galeta Intervening)
...Galeta is entitled to succeed in the application for intervention. [24] SARRAL, by its opposition, has caused what should have been a H 2008 (4) SA p154 A Gautschi A relatively simple application to grow to unnecessary proportions (over 500 pages), and its opposition was in my view unreason......
-
BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Finlay
...me to drawing a negative inference. See Brand v Minister of Justice 1959 (4) SA 712 (A) 715F-716F; Raliphaswa v Mugivhi and others 2008 (4) SA 154 (SCA) at para [15] on 157I-158A Snyders AJA states the "When a witness is equally available to both parties, but not called to give evidence, it......