R v Chisvo and Others

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeBeadle CJ, Macdonald AJP and Jarvis AJA
Judgment Date14 May 1968
Citation1968 (3) SA 353 (RA)
Hearing Date14 May 1968
CourtAppellate Division

Beadle, C.J.:

The eight appellants in this case were charged in the General Division of the High Court with contravening para. (a) of subsec. (1), as read with para. (a) of sub-sec. (4) of sec. 48A of the Law and Order (Maintenance) Act, Chap. 39, that is, that they with G intent to endanger the maintenance of law and order in Rhodesia were in possession of certain weapons of war. They were duly convicted and as the statute prescribes a mandatory death sentence for a contravention of this section they were sentenced to death.

They now appeal both against conviction and sentence.

H Mr. Taylor, who has appeared for all eight appellants, has stated that he is unable to direct any argument to the Court in respect of any of the appellants with the exception of No. (7) appellant, Ben Manduku.

I will deal, first, with the cases of the seven appellants in respect of whom Mr. Taylor has nothing to say.

[The learned Judge then dealt with the evidence and proceeded.]

In the circumstances, the appeals against both conviction and sentence in respect of these seven appellants must be dismissed.

Beadle CJ

I turn now to the case of the appellant Ben Manduku.

[The learned...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • S v Safatsa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...643H - 644C; Burnell v British Transport Commission [1955] 3 All ER 822 (CA); R v Barton [1972] 2 All ER 1192; R v Chisvo and Others 1968 (3) SA 353 (RA) at 354G - H. Cur adv vult. Postea (December 1). I Judgment Botha JA: On 3 September 1984 Mr Kuzwayo Jacob Dlamini, the deputy mayor of th......
  • R v Tavares
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the minimum wage and for the appropriate cost-of-living allowance prescribed in the agreement. It follows that the appellant ought, in 1968 (3) SA p353 Jarvis AJA respect of the complainant, to have kept the records prescribed by the agreement. I would dismiss the appeal and confirm the con......
2 cases
  • S v Safatsa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...643H - 644C; Burnell v British Transport Commission [1955] 3 All ER 822 (CA); R v Barton [1972] 2 All ER 1192; R v Chisvo and Others 1968 (3) SA 353 (RA) at 354G - H. Cur adv vult. Postea (December 1). I Judgment Botha JA: On 3 September 1984 Mr Kuzwayo Jacob Dlamini, the deputy mayor of th......
  • R v Tavares
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the minimum wage and for the appropriate cost-of-living allowance prescribed in the agreement. It follows that the appellant ought, in 1968 (3) SA p353 Jarvis AJA respect of the complainant, to have kept the records prescribed by the agreement. I would dismiss the appeal and confirm the con......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT