Punishing foreign and local companies (corporations) for bribery in Mauritius: The need to amend the Prevention of Corruption Act

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Date16 August 2019
Published date16 August 2019
Pages42-53
AuthorJamil Ddamulira Mujuzi
42
PUNISHING FOREIGN AND LOCAL
COMPANIES (CORPORATIONS)
FOR BRIBERY IN MAURITIUS: THE
NEED TO AMEND THE PREVENTION
OF CORRUPTION ACT
JAMIL DDAMULIRA MUJUZI*
Associate Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of the
Western Cape
ABSTRACT
The 2002 Mauritian Prevention of Corruption Act1 (POCA or the
Act) provides for different offences. Section 5 of POCA provides for
the offence of bribery and states that ‘any person guilty shall be
liable to penal servitude’. This means that POCA does not provide
an appropriate sentence for juristic persons because juristic persons
cannot be sentenced to imprisonment or penal servitude. This
is what one of the courts in Mauritius found when it convicted
two foreign companies of bribery but could not sentence them to
prison. In this article the author argues that Mauritian legislators
should amend POCA to provide for sentences that may be imposed
on companies convicted of offences under the Act. The author
also argues that, in addition to prosecution, Mauritius may find
it useful to adopt the deferred prosecution agreements approach
as one of the ways to ensure that companies are deterred from
committing corruption and also to ensure that they put effective
measures in place to combat corruption.
* The author wrote this paper while he was a visiting academic at the Centre for
Criminology, University of Oxford, from 30 May 2015 to 29 June 2015. He is
grateful to Prof Mary Bosworth of the Centre for Criminology, University of
Oxford, for hosting him, and to the University of Oxford which awarded him
a grant from the Oppenheimer Fund to cater for some of the expenses for the
research visit. This paper is also based on the research supported partly by the
National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant specific unique reference
number (UID) 86004) .The author acknowledges that opinions, findings and
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author
and that the NRF accepts no liability whatsoever in this regard. Email: djmujuzi@
gmail.com.
1 Prevention of Corruption Act 5 of 2002, proclaimed by Proc 18 of 2002 wef
1 April 2002.
(2015) 1(2) JCCL&P 42
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT