Public Debt, Economic Growth and Inflation in African Economies

AuthorTiago Neves Sequeira,Alexandra Ferreira‐Lopes,José Augusto Lopes da Veiga
Published date01 June 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12104
Date01 June 2016
PUBLIC DEBT, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INFLATION
IN AFRICAN ECONOMIES
JOSÉ AUGUSTO LOPES DA VEIGA
,
ALEXANDRA FERREIRA-LOPES
*
AND TIAGO NEVES SEQUEIRA
Abstract
We analyse the relationship between public debt, economic growth and inflation in a group of 52
African economies between 1950 and 2012. The results indicate that the limits of public debt are
negatively related to economic growth and exhibit, from a given level of debt, an inverted U
behaviour regarding the relationship between economic growth and public debt. Briefly, the high
levels of public debt are coincident with reduced rates of economic growth and rising levels of
inflation. Our results for three specific geographical areas resemble those of the overall analysis,
despite some differences. In North African countries, the growth rates of the gross domestic
product (GDP) and inflation also show an inverted U behaviour as the ratio of public debt/GDP
increases. The highest rate of economic growth is recorded when the ratio of public debt/GDP is
below 30% of GDP and corresponds to an average inflation rate of 5.33%. An identical behaviour
of the GDP growth rates and inflation also appears in Sub-Saharan countries until the third
interval (60–90%). However,the highest growth rate of the GDP and GDP per capita is registered
when the public debt/GDP ratio is in the second interval (30–60%). For the countries of the
Southern Africa Development Community, the highest average rate of economic growth (6.8%)
is similar to North African countries, when the ratio public debt/GDP is below 30% of GDP, with
an average inflation rate of 11%. A number of robustness analyses were performed and the great
majority of them confirm the general analysis.
JEL Classification: E31, E62, H63, O40
Keywords: Public debt, economic growth, inflation, African countries
1. INTRODUCTION
Public debt in African countries is an issue of global concern. The burden of public debt
and widespread indebtedness of these economies has been the subject of spirited debate
among economists, academics, policy makers and the general public.
The public debt issue and its burden started in the late 1970s when the international
trade and financial environment manifested very favourably for developing countries,
* Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, ISCTE – IUL,
ISCTE Business School Economics Department, BRU-IUL (Business Research Unit), Lisboa,
Portugal; and CEFAGE-UBI, Av. Forças Armadas 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail:
alexandra.ferreira.lopes@iscte.pt.
Universidade do Mindelo, Management and Economics Department and Universidadeda Beira
Interior.
Universidade da Beira Interior and CEFAGE– UBI. Management and Economics Department.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from FCT, and Tiago Neves Sequeira also
acknowledges financial support through Grant FEDER/COMPETE, PEst-C/EGE/UI4007/
2013. We also thank the comments and suggestions of two referees and the associate editor. The
usual disclaimer applies.
South African Journal of Economics Vol. ••:•• •• 2015
© 2015 Economic Society of South Africa. doi: 10.1111/saje.12104
1
V
C2015 Economic Society of South Africa. doi: 10.1111/saje.12104
294
South African Journal of Economics Vol. 84:2 June 2016
South African Journal
of Economics
with particular emphasis for the African countries. The increasein expor ts, the negative real
interest rates in international capital markets and the high price levels of export markets,
which favoured the terms of trade of these countries, were crucial to an explosion of public
consumption and investment, with considerable impact on the increase of public debt of
these countries. In this context, the debt of African countries has rapidly grown and
culminated in the debt crisis of the 1980s and 1990s with negative impact on their growth.
In fact, as very well stated by Tarp (1993), for many decades the performance of
African economies has been disappointing. The average annual gross domestic product
(GDP) growth rate, which reached a level of 5% from 1965 to 1973, declined to only
3.2% during the later part of the 1970s. This growth rate further dropped to 2.1% in
1980. With a rapidly growing population, the real GDP per capita fell by 1.1% during
the 1980s.
The UNCTAD (2004) states that “Africa’s external debt burden increased significantly
between 1970 and 1999. From just over $11 billion in 1970, Africa had accumulated over
$120 billion of external debt in the midst of the external shocks of the early 1980s. Total
external debt then worsened significantly during the period of structural adjustment in the
1980s and early 1990s, reaching a peak of about $340 billion in 1995. Overall, Africa’s
external debt averaged $39 billion during the 1970s, before ballooning to just over $317
billion in the late 1990s. Over the same period, total debt service paid by the continent
increased from about $3.5 billion to a peak of $26 billion.” The situation became
unsustainable, and it was clear that these countries would not be able to repay their debt and
that a solution was needed.The negotiation of a debt reduction programme started with the
Paris Club in the early 1990s and assumed a more solid structure in 1996 with the Highly
Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, launched by the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF). The purpose of this initiative is to reduce the debt
burden of poor countries to sustainable levels in order to ensure that no country faces a debt
burden that it cannot manage. It is designed to help those countries that cannot reach a
sustainable debt burden through traditional mechanisms of rescheduling and debt
reduction. These countries must follow the IMF- and World Bank-supported adjustment
programmes and must implement a poverty reduction strategy.
The public debt crisis and the inherent fiscal deficit constitute a big issue in African
economies, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa where fiscal deficit is a common
phenomenon due to high level of public expenditures. As stated by Collier (1996), the ratio
of Sub-Saharan Africa fiscal deficits to GDP reached an average rate of 4.33% between
1985 and 1994, which indicates that the ratio of public investment in Sub-Saharan Africa
has not only been consistently higher compared with other regions but also the low returns
on the public investment were responsible for the decline in growthperformance. However,
in a recent paper, Marcelino and Hakobyan (2014) discuss the effects of the HIPC
Initiative on growth and conclude that this programme was beneficial to growth.
Generally, the fiscal policy measures adopted seeking to increase the state revenues and
reverse the course of growing national debt have not produced the desired results, and the
socio-economic conditions of the citizens have not improved. The uncontrolled
proliferation of small informal economic activities as a source of livelihood and survival
of many families affects the mechanism of effective taxation and defeats the purpose of the
fiscal policy measures.
In this situation, countries are obliged to borrow more money to fill in the gap between
the expenditures and the revenues during fiscal periods.The internal and external loans are,
South African Journal of Economics Vol. ••:•• •• 20152
© 2015 Economic Society of South Africa.
295South African Journal of Economics Vol. 84:2 June 2016
V
C2015 Economic Society of South Africa.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT