Provision for doubtful debts : non-banks (more accounting influences)
Author | Michael Rudnicki |
Date | 01 March 2020 |
Record Number | btclq_v11_n1_a3 |
Published date | 01 March 2020 |
Pages | 9-17 |
DOI | 10.10520/EJC-1ceb33cf5f |
9
© SIBER INK
Provision for Doubtful Debts:
NON-BANKS (MORE ACCOUNTING
MICHAEL RUDNICKI
ABSTRACT
A number of references to accounting principles and statements have found
most recent section of the Act which has introduced references to accounting
Section 11(j
to credit provisioning. The section provides for a 25% allowance in relation
to credit impairments, and 40% in relation to a loss allowance relating to
impairment that is measured at an amount equal to the lifetime expected
-
mined in relation to the lifetime expected credit loss of debt. The expecta-
tion of credit loss is assessed based on the risk of default occurring over the
expected life of each loan, or collection of loans, and is based on reasonable
and supportable information. If the credit risk has not increased significantly
since initial recognition, the loss allowance is equal to the 12-month expected
-
ability of default as opposed to information in the past.
Measurement of expected credit losses is established by evaluating a range
of possible outcomes which are weighted and present valued with a time
value of money determination.
11(j
based on the lifetime expected credit loss, which means that the financial
instrument(s) have significant credit-risk increase since initial recognition,
40% of the accounting provision is applied for section 11(j) purposes. Subject
to a directive from SARS for credit impaired debt, which may result in an 85%
allowance, the 40% provision is applied. Where significant credit risk does not
exist in relation to financial instruments, a 25% allowance is applied.
Introduction
Prior to years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2019 the
allowance for doubtful debts was premised on a fixed, arbitrary rate of 25%
applied to a list of debts, which in the opinion of SARS, was considered
doubtful. The rules relating to the allowance are found in section 11(j) of
the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the Act). Although the practice of SARS was
to permit a 25% allowance, the section was subject to objection and appeal.
To continue reading
Request your trial