Prinsloo v Nasionale Vervolgingsgesag en Andere

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation2011 (1) SACR 196 (GNP)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • 2012 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 Agosto 2019
    ...138© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd Prinsloo v Nasionale Vervolgingsgesag 2011 (1) SACR 196 (GNP) .... 391, 411Prinsloo v Van der Linde 1997 (3) SA 1012 (CC) ............................... 380Pullen NO, Bartman NO and Orr NO v Waja 1929 TPD 838 ............. 164QQ v Jacobs (1886-7) 4 HCG 236 .......
  • Director of Public Prosecutions, Transkei v Dubo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...we are of the opinion that it will better serve the interest of justice if we were to remit the case to the court a quo for fresh J 2011 (1) SACR p196 Pakade A sentencing by the magistrate, after taking into consideration the proper age of the respondent, the gravity of the offence and the ......
1 cases
  • Director of Public Prosecutions, Transkei v Dubo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...we are of the opinion that it will better serve the interest of justice if we were to remit the case to the court a quo for fresh J 2011 (1) SACR p196 Pakade A sentencing by the magistrate, after taking into consideration the proper age of the respondent, the gravity of the offence and the ......
1 books & journal articles
  • 2012 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 Agosto 2019
    ...138© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd Prinsloo v Nasionale Vervolgingsgesag 2011 (1) SACR 196 (GNP) .... 391, 411Prinsloo v Van der Linde 1997 (3) SA 1012 (CC) ............................... 380Pullen NO, Bartman NO and Orr NO v Waja 1929 TPD 838 ............. 164QQ v Jacobs (1886-7) 4 HCG 236 .......