Pithey v Road Accident Fund

JurisdictionSouth Africa
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Pithey v Road Accident Fund
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 145 (A): referred to Nkisimane and Others v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1978 (2) SA 430 (A): B referred to Pithey v Road Accident Fund 2013 (5) SA 226 (GNP): reversed on Road Accident Fund v M obo M [2005] 3 All SA 340 (SCA): referred to Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Suid-Afrika Bpk v ......
  • Meso v Road Accident Fund
    • South Africa
    • North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
    • 8 Noviembre 2013
    ...the ability of the fund to be able to identify deserving claims in Pithey v Road Accident Fund (A375/2010) [2012] ZAGPPHC 158; 2013 (5) SA 226 (GNP) (10 August 2012); opining "the respondent is funded by and administers public funds obtained from the taxpayers' pockets. It must therefore ta......
  • Rabie v De Wit
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...occasions been issued against practitioners; [13] yet still the problem persists, as the present appeal illustrates. It is accordingly 2013 (5) SA p226 Griesel J and Nyman A necessary once again to remind practitioners of their duties in this regard and to warn them of the consequences of n......
3 cases
  • Pithey v Road Accident Fund
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 145 (A): referred to Nkisimane and Others v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1978 (2) SA 430 (A): B referred to Pithey v Road Accident Fund 2013 (5) SA 226 (GNP): reversed on Road Accident Fund v M obo M [2005] 3 All SA 340 (SCA): referred to Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Suid-Afrika Bpk v ......
  • Meso v Road Accident Fund
    • South Africa
    • North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
    • 8 Noviembre 2013
    ...the ability of the fund to be able to identify deserving claims in Pithey v Road Accident Fund (A375/2010) [2012] ZAGPPHC 158; 2013 (5) SA 226 (GNP) (10 August 2012); opining "the respondent is funded by and administers public funds obtained from the taxpayers' pockets. It must therefore ta......
  • Rabie v De Wit
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...occasions been issued against practitioners; [13] yet still the problem persists, as the present appeal illustrates. It is accordingly 2013 (5) SA p226 Griesel J and Nyman A necessary once again to remind practitioners of their duties in this regard and to warn them of the consequences of n......
3 provisions
  • Pithey v Road Accident Fund
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 145 (A): referred to Nkisimane and Others v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1978 (2) SA 430 (A): B referred to Pithey v Road Accident Fund 2013 (5) SA 226 (GNP): reversed on Road Accident Fund v M obo M [2005] 3 All SA 340 (SCA): referred to Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Suid-Afrika Bpk v ......
  • Meso v Road Accident Fund
    • South Africa
    • North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
    • 8 Noviembre 2013
    ...the ability of the fund to be able to identify deserving claims in Pithey v Road Accident Fund (A375/2010) [2012] ZAGPPHC 158; 2013 (5) SA 226 (GNP) (10 August 2012); opining "the respondent is funded by and administers public funds obtained from the taxpayers' pockets. It must therefore ta......
  • Rabie v De Wit
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...occasions been issued against practitioners; [13] yet still the problem persists, as the present appeal illustrates. It is accordingly 2013 (5) SA p226 Griesel J and Nyman A necessary once again to remind practitioners of their duties in this regard and to warn them of the consequences of n......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT