Peeping at Malawi's tobacco industry with an anti-trust lens : are there thieves at the dinner table?

AuthorMike Chinoko
Date01 January 2013
Pages35-55
Published date01 January 2013
DOI10.10520/EJC161850
PEEPING AT MALAWI’S TOBACCO
INDUSTRY WITH AN ANTI-TRUST LENS: ARE
THERE THIEVES AT THE DINNER TABLE?
Mike Chinoko*
ABSTRACT
This article critically analyses the structure and conduct of business in the tobacco
industry in Malawi from a competition law point of view. The tobacco industry
in Malawi is an old one dating back to colonial days, but until fairly recently,
Malawi had no law regulating competition and fair trading. Hence the fight
against anti-competitive practices in the industry did not have the full backing of
the law. In light of the now operational Competition and Fair Trading Act as well
as the international jurisprudence on the subject, this article focuses on one aspect
of competition law called cartels and analyses whether traits of cartel behaviour
are prevalent in the tobacco industry in Malawi. It is hoped that the points that
are raised in this article will spur the Competition Commission into action to look
into anti-competitive practices in the industry, more especially the cartels.
I INTRODUCTION
Malawi is a commonwealth jurisdiction located in Southern Africa. It
has a very small economy and is classified as a least developed country on the
global economic index. Although the country is relatively endowed with
mineral resources, agriculture has been the main driving force of its econ-
omy with tobacco as its main cash crop. The country is one of the world’s
leading exporters of barley tobacco and it is said that tobacco accounts for
60% of Malawi’s exports, 13% of its GDP and 23% of its total tax base.1The
industry is structured in such a way that there is a regulator called the
PEEPING AT MALAWI’S TOBACCO INDUSTRY 35
LLB Hons (Malawi); LLM in International Trade and Investment Law (Pretoria); LLM in Inter-
national Business and Economic Law (Georgetown); Assistant Chief Law Reform Officer, Malawi
Law Commission.
*
1 S Jaffee ‘Malawi’s Tobacco Sector: Standing on one strong leg is better than on none’ (2003)
World Bank: Africa Region Working Paper Series No 55.
Tobacco Control Commission; a single entity which runs auction sales for
tobacco called Auction Holdings Limited; and about six tobacco companies
that buy the leaf from farmers on the Auction Floors, process it and export it
to outside markets. Given its undoubted economic importance to Malawi,
the tobacco industry is indeed a sector that should be nurtured and pro-
moted to foster economic development.Yet,overtheyearsthegovernment
seems to have played a blind eye to anti-trust issues in the industry and
treated them as innocuous when they should have taken centre stage to stim-
ulate vibrant and progressive competition in the industry. There is no
denying the fact that competition policy reforms allow markets to work
more efficiently for the benefit of consumers and drive sustainable economic
growth.Thisisthemainobjectiveofany competition regime. It is said that
greater market competition matters for achieving greater innovation, pro-
ductivity and economic growth2and that policies that help open markets and
remove anti-competitive regulations can promote competition, resulting in
lowerpricesandbetterdealsforconsumersandfirms.
3However, in the case
of Malawi, traits of anti-competitive behaviour in the tobacco industry can
be seen from afar and this was worsened by the fact that Malawi did not have
anti-trust legislation until 1998 when the Competition and Fair Trading Act4
was enacted. Apart from prohibiting certain anti-competitive behaviour, it
established the Competition and Fair Trading Commission.5However, the
Commission only became fully operational a few years ago.
This article is therefore an attempt to critically examine the existing
market structure in the tobacco industry in the light of the new law on com-
petition and also the existing literature on anti-trust issues. As will later be
argued, the structure of the industry is kind of the opposite of the traditional
competition triangle where, instead of having consumer detriment in the
form of high prices, it is actually the buyers who seemingly engage in
anti-competitive behaviour that harms producers and tend to lower prices of
tobacco. This immediately begs the question whether this is a competition
law issue and whether the law should extend its reach to tackle this problem
which has manifested itself in the not-so-traditional way. This discussion
should be relevant to other sectors of the Malawi economy with similar
problems such as the tea or cotton industry. In this context, this article looks
36 (2013) MLJ VOLUME 7
2 M Kitzmuller & MM Licetti ‘View Point: Public policy for private sector’ (2012) Note Number
331, the World Bank Group.
3Asabove.
4 Cap 49:09 of the Laws of Malawi.
5 Section 4 of the Competition and Fair Trading Act.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT