Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Citation | 1996 (3) SA 553 (A) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Motswai v Road Accident Fund
...para [17] appliedMouton v Road Accident Fund and Others [2005] JOL 13227 (W): referredtoMutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A): referredtoNdebele v Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd 1995 (2) 699 (W): approvedPithey v Road Accident Fund [2012] ZAGPPHC 158: referred t......
-
Road Accident Fund v Clayton
...considered Marine & Trade Insurance Co Ltd v Katz NO 1979 (4) SA 961 (A): distinguished Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A): distinguished F Santam Insurance Ltd v Taylor 1985 (1) SA 514 (A): Statutes Considered Statutes The Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents F......
-
Motswai v Road Accident Fund
...judgment in Mouton v Road Accident Fund and Others [2005] JOL 13227 (W). [18] See also Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A). [19] That accident took place in March [20] The basis upon which an agreement was reached that Motswai would be liable to 20% of costs is u......
-
Clayton v The Road Accident Fund
...that head. The claim under review in that case was not a limited liability claim. In Mutual and Federal Insurance Co. Ltd v Ndebelle 1996 (3) SA 553 (A) the Court was faced with the position where liability had been apportioned between the parties. The Court held that the Fund was entitled ......
4 cases
-
Motswai v Road Accident Fund
...para [17] appliedMouton v Road Accident Fund and Others [2005] JOL 13227 (W): referredtoMutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A): referredtoNdebele v Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd 1995 (2) 699 (W): approvedPithey v Road Accident Fund [2012] ZAGPPHC 158: referred t......
-
Road Accident Fund v Clayton
...considered Marine & Trade Insurance Co Ltd v Katz NO 1979 (4) SA 961 (A): distinguished Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A): distinguished F Santam Insurance Ltd v Taylor 1985 (1) SA 514 (A): Statutes Considered Statutes The Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents F......
-
Motswai v Road Accident Fund
...judgment in Mouton v Road Accident Fund and Others [2005] JOL 13227 (W). [18] See also Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A). [19] That accident took place in March [20] The basis upon which an agreement was reached that Motswai would be liable to 20% of costs is u......
-
Clayton v The Road Accident Fund
...that head. The claim under review in that case was not a limited liability claim. In Mutual and Federal Insurance Co. Ltd v Ndebelle 1996 (3) SA 553 (A) the Court was faced with the position where liability had been apportioned between the parties. The Court held that the Fund was entitled ......
4 provisions
-
Motswai v Road Accident Fund
...para [17] appliedMouton v Road Accident Fund and Others [2005] JOL 13227 (W): referredtoMutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A): referredtoNdebele v Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd 1995 (2) 699 (W): approvedPithey v Road Accident Fund [2012] ZAGPPHC 158: referred t......
-
Road Accident Fund v Clayton
...considered Marine & Trade Insurance Co Ltd v Katz NO 1979 (4) SA 961 (A): distinguished Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A): distinguished F Santam Insurance Ltd v Taylor 1985 (1) SA 514 (A): Statutes Considered Statutes The Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents F......
-
Motswai v Road Accident Fund
...judgment in Mouton v Road Accident Fund and Others [2005] JOL 13227 (W). [18] See also Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd v Ndebele 1996 (3) SA 553 (A). [19] That accident took place in March [20] The basis upon which an agreement was reached that Motswai would be liable to 20% of costs is u......
-
Clayton v The Road Accident Fund
...that head. The claim under review in that case was not a limited liability claim. In Mutual and Federal Insurance Co. Ltd v Ndebelle 1996 (3) SA 553 (A) the Court was faced with the position where liability had been apportioned between the parties. The Court held that the Fund was entitled ......