Mohunram and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae)
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Citation | 2007 (4) SA 222 (CC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
50 practice notes
-
Criminal Procedure
...proceeds of cr ime – and one can therefore recogn ise unlawfu l proceeds as ‘property’ for purpo ses 118 Paras 16–18.119 Para 19.120 2007 4 (SA) 222 (CC).121 2006 (2) SACR 525 (CC).122 Para 34.123 Para 43.124 Para 48.125 Para 49.126 Paras 52 and 67.127 Para 55.© Juta and Company (Pty) CRImI......
-
Falk and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions
...and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (2) SACR 145 (CC) B (2007 (4) SA 222; 2007 (6) BCLR 575): dictum in para [9] Motsepe v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1997 (2) SA 898 (CC) (1997 (6) BCLR 692): dictum in paras [30]......
-
Why the Security Right in Section 118(3) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 is not Enforceable Against Successors in Title – A Follow-up Occasioned by the SCA’S Mitchell Judgment
...v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC) par a 69; Mohunram v National Direct or of Public Prosec utions (Law Revie w Project as Amicus Cur iae) 2007 4 SA 222 (CC) para 121; AJ van der Walt “Procedur ally Arbitrar y Deprivation of Pr operty” (2012) 23 Stell LR 88 94.WHY SEC 118(3) IS NOT ENFORCEABLE: AG......
-
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Ramlutchman
...and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (2) SACR 145 (CC) C (2007 (4) SA 222; 2007 (6) BCLR 575; [2007] ZACC 4): National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Minister of Justice and Others 1998 (2) SACR 5......
Request a trial to view additional results
45 cases
-
Falk and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions
...and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (2) SACR 145 (CC) B (2007 (4) SA 222; 2007 (6) BCLR 575): dictum in para [9] Motsepe v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1997 (2) SA 898 (CC) (1997 (6) BCLR 692): dictum in paras [30]......
-
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Ramlutchman
...and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (2) SACR 145 (CC) C (2007 (4) SA 222; 2007 (6) BCLR 575; [2007] ZACC 4): National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Minister of Justice and Others 1998 (2) SACR 5......
-
Van der Burg and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another
...and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another C (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (2) SACR 145 (CC) (2007 (4) SA 222; 2007 (6) BCLR 575; [2007] ZACC 4): National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another v Mohamed NO and Others 2002 (2) SACR 196 (CC) (2002 (4......
-
National Credit Regulator v Opperman and Others
...ZACC 9): referred to Mohunram and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (4) SA 222 (CC) (2007 (2) SACR 145; 2007 (6) BCLR 575; [2007] ZACC 4): dictum in para [121] B Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipalit......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Procedure
...proceeds of cr ime – and one can therefore recogn ise unlawfu l proceeds as ‘property’ for purpo ses 118 Paras 16–18.119 Para 19.120 2007 4 (SA) 222 (CC).121 2006 (2) SACR 525 (CC).122 Para 34.123 Para 43.124 Para 48.125 Para 49.126 Paras 52 and 67.127 Para 55.© Juta and Company (Pty) CRImI......
-
Why the Security Right in Section 118(3) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 is not Enforceable Against Successors in Title – A Follow-up Occasioned by the SCA’S Mitchell Judgment
...v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC) par a 69; Mohunram v National Direct or of Public Prosec utions (Law Revie w Project as Amicus Cur iae) 2007 4 SA 222 (CC) para 121; AJ van der Walt “Procedur ally Arbitrar y Deprivation of Pr operty” (2012) 23 Stell LR 88 94.WHY SEC 118(3) IS NOT ENFORCEABLE: AG......
-
Constitutional Law
...example, Prophet v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2007 (6) SA 169 (CC); Mohunram v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2007 (4) SA 222 (CC); Van der Burg v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2012 (2) SACR 331 (CC); Brooks v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2017 ......
-
Forfeiting proceeds: Civil forfeiture, the right to property and the Constitution
...2007 (6) S A 169 (CC) (‘Prophet’ ).6 Mohunram v Nationa l Director of Public Prosec utions (Law Rev iew Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 (4) SA 222 (CC) (‘Mohunram’).7 National Direc tor of Public Prose cutions v Botha NO 2 020 (1) SACR 599 (CC) (‘Botha’).8 The scope of Botha ibid is discusse......
Request a trial to view additional results