Measuring Persistence in Inflation: Evidence For angola

AuthorJúlio António Delgado,Leonardo Dia Massala,José Manuel Belbute
Date01 December 2016
Published date01 December 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12118
MEASURING PERSISTENCE IN INFLATION:
EVIDENCE FOR ANGOLA
JOSE
´MANUEL BELBUTE*
,LEONARDO DIA MASSALA
AND JU
´LIO ANTO
´NIO DELGADO
§
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the degree of persistence in five inflation indicators for
Angola, and to identify the implications for decision making. Our results suggest that when
structural breaks are accounted for, all five inflation indicators are stationary. Second, our findings
suggest that persistence is not too high. Moreover, the degree of persistence is similar among the
five inflation indicators and throughout the sample period. Finally, our results also show that
extracting the most volatile components of the headline inflation indicator does not generate a
new inflation indicator that is less volatile and more persistent than the original. These results
have important policy implications as the National Bank of Angola is preparing to change its
monetary policy focus to a more inflation-targeting regime.
JEL Classification: C14, C22, E31, E52
Keywords: Inflation, persistence, Angola
1. INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION
The purpose of this paper is to measure the degree of persistence in the headline, food,
energy, underlying and 10% trimmed core inflation indicators for Angola and to identify
the implications for decision making for both the public and private sectors.
In the long run, inflation is a monetary phenomenon, thereby entirely determined by
monetary policy. However, in the short term, inflation might temporarily move away
from the central bank’s inflation target as a result of economic shocks, such us changes in
economic activity or in production costs. Therefore, understanding persistence in infla-
tion is a central issue for economic policy makers because it may have crucial implica-
tions for the design, implementation and effectiveness of monetary policy, especially
when following an inflation-targeting monetary regime (see, among others, Levin and
Piger, 2003; Gadzinski and Orlandi, 2004; Marques, 2004; Pivetta and Reis, 2007;
Fuhrer, 2009; Cogley et al., 2010; Dias and Marquesm 2010). In particular, the appro-
priate response to a random shock depends on the degree to which its effects on inflation
will persist. If inflation is highly (weakly) persistent, then bringing inflation back to its
* Corresponding author: Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of
Evora,
Portugal. E-mail: jbelbute@uevora.pt
Center for Advanced Studies in Management and Economics - CEFAGE-UE, Portugal.
Department of Economic Studies, Banco Nacional de Angola.
§
INOVE Research.
Contract grant sponsor: Fundac¸~ao para a Ci^encia e a Tecnologia and FEDER/COMPETE;
contract grant number: UID/ECO/04007/2013.
The authors are grateful to the SAJE’s Managing Editor and to two anonymous referee for
their helpful comments and insights.
V
C2015 Economic Society of South Africa. doi: 10.1111/saje.12118
594
South African Journal of Economics Vol. 84:4 December 2016
South African Journal
of Economics

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT