Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Makhafola J |
| Judgment Date | 28 May 2010 |
| Docket Number | 833-1128/2007 |
| Court | Limpopo Local Division, Thohoyandu |
| Hearing Date | 28 May 2010 |
| Citation | 2011 JDR 1014 (LT) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
S v Mgumbi
...to questions of fact or law. Argument does not constitute evidence and cannot replace evidence. Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT) para [24] The oversight by the regional magistrate renders these proceedings irregular. Bail applications are sui generis in nature, but that ......
-
S v Mgumbi
...to questions of fact or law. Argument does not constitute evidence and cannot replace evidence. Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT) para [24] The oversight by the regional magistrate renders these proceedings irregular. Bail applications are sui generis in nature, but that ......
-
S v Mgumbi
...urgently hear the bail application on new facts. (See [23] and [27].) 2022 (1) SACR p479 Cases cited Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT): dictum in para [13] S v Barber 1979 (4) SA 218 (D): applied S v Lupuwana ECP CA&R 03/2015: dictum in para [41] applied. Legislation cite......
-
S v Mgumbi
...urgently hear the bail application on new facts. (See [23] and [27].) 2022 (1) SACR p479 Cases cited Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT): dictum in para [13] S v Barber 1979 (4) SA 218 (D): applied S v Lupuwana ECP CA&R 03/2015: dictum in para [41] applied. Legislation cite......
4 cases
-
S v Mgumbi
...to questions of fact or law. Argument does not constitute evidence and cannot replace evidence. Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT) para [24] The oversight by the regional magistrate renders these proceedings irregular. Bail applications are sui generis in nature, but that ......
-
S v Mgumbi
...to questions of fact or law. Argument does not constitute evidence and cannot replace evidence. Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT) para [24] The oversight by the regional magistrate renders these proceedings irregular. Bail applications are sui generis in nature, but that ......
-
S v Mgumbi
...urgently hear the bail application on new facts. (See [23] and [27].) 2022 (1) SACR p479 Cases cited Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT): dictum in para [13] S v Barber 1979 (4) SA 218 (D): applied S v Lupuwana ECP CA&R 03/2015: dictum in para [41] applied. Legislation cite......
-
S v Mgumbi
...urgently hear the bail application on new facts. (See [23] and [27].) 2022 (1) SACR p479 Cases cited Maboho v Minister of Home Affairs 2011 JDR 1014 (LT): dictum in para [13] S v Barber 1979 (4) SA 218 (D): applied S v Lupuwana ECP CA&R 03/2015: dictum in para [41] applied. Legislation cite......