Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeJoubert AR, Van Heerden AR, Nestadt AR, Kumleben AR, Van Coller Wn AR
Judgment Date29 May 1992
Hearing Date05 March 1992
CourtAppellate Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
  • Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 20 May 2014
    ...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
  • Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
  • Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......
4 cases
  • Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
  • Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 20 May 2014
    ...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
  • Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
  • Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......
4 provisions
  • Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
  • Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 20 May 2014
    ...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
  • Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
  • Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT