Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeJoubert AR, Van Heerden AR, Nestadt AR, Kumleben AR, Van Coller Wn AR
Judgment Date29 May 1992
Citation1992 (3) SA 868 (A)
Hearing Date05 March 1992
CourtAppellate Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
  • Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 20 May 2014
    ...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
  • Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
  • Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......
4 cases
  • Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
  • Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Division, Pretoria
    • 20 May 2014
    ...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
  • Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
  • Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT