Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Joubert AR, Van Heerden AR, Nestadt AR, Kumleben AR, Van Coller Wn AR |
| Judgment Date | 29 May 1992 |
| Citation | 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) |
| Hearing Date | 05 March 1992 |
| Court | Appellate Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
-
Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
-
Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
-
Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......
4 cases
-
Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service
...(1980) 42 SATC 263: considered ITC 1324 (1980) 42 SATC 288: considered ITC 1630 (1997) 60 SATC 59: criticised Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A): referred to Malan v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1983 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to J 2015 (1) SA p62 Poynton v Cran A 1910 AD 205: com......
-
Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Factaprops 1052 CC
...at p.146 et seq. [8] Paragraph 3.1 at p.35-37, See also para 3.2 at p.37 [9] Butterworths 2007, p.165-166 [10] 1992 (3) SA 60 (A) and 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) respectively [11] At page 116 thereof [12] Service Issue 20.09.2013. Pp3- 43 [13] 1964 (2) ALL SA 448 (A) (Parallel citation 1964 (2) SA ......
-
Velcich and Others v Land and Agricultural Bank of South Africa and Others
...Considered Annotations Reported cases The following decided cases were cited in the judgment of the Court: E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) Wiber v Mahodini (1904) 21 SC Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Transvaal Provincial Division (Roux J). The facts appear from th......
-
Boland Bank Bpk v Engelbrecht en Andere
...SA 118 (T) op 118A Kessoopersadh en 'n Ander v Essop en 'n Ander 1970 (1) SA 265 (A) op 278H, 279A-C, 282A-284C E Lubbe v Volkskas Bpk 1992 (3) SA 868 (A) op Mahomed NO v Union Government (Minister of the Interior) 1911 AD 1 op 8 Messenger of the Magistrate's Court, Durban v Pillay 1952 (3)......