Land Matters and Rural Development: 2021

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Date01 December 2022
Pages1-23
AuthorJuanita M Pienaar,Willemien Du Plessis,Ebrezia Johnson
Published date01 December 2022
DOI10.25159/2522-6800/12375
Commentary
Southern African Public Law
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/12375
https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/SAPL
ISSN 2522-6800 (Online), ISSN 2219-6412 (Print)
Volume 37 | Number 2 | 2022 | #12375 | 23 pages
© Unisa Press 2023
Published by Unisa Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)
Land Matters and Rural Development: 2021
Willemien Du Plessis
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0907-5063
North-West University
willemien.duplessis@nwu.ac.za
Abstract
While the report period was dominated by the review process of the property
clause, aimed at enabling the expropriation of land for land reform purposes at
nil compensation, various other important developments occurred in 2021,
dealing with land. Included herewith was the publication of various bills,
dealing inter alia, with the Land Court and housing-related matters; the
publication of the long-awaited Upgrading of Land Rights Amendment Act, as
well as the handing down of critical judgments within the domains of
redistribution, tenure reform and restitution respectively. Given that the review
process did not result in an amended property clause, the underlying difficulties
in land reform continue to be addressed holistically under the extant, unchanged
section 25 of the Constitution.
Keywords: land reform distribution; tenure reform; section 25 of the Constitution;
Land Court Bill; housing; rural development and land reform; unlawful
occupation of land and eviction
Pienaar, Du Plessis and Johnson
2
General
In 2021 the amendment to section 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996 (Constitution) did not pass parliamentary muster. However, a Land Court Bill was
introduced to provide for a permanent land court that could adjudicate matters on land
and hopefully expedite land restitution matters, amongst others. Land restitution
remains a contentious issue and various challenges marred the process. The land claims
court had to deal with the interpretation of just and equitable compensation and provides
valuable input in this regard.
Various land reform matters came to the fore. The Interim Protection of Informal Land
Rights Act 31 of 1996 was extended for another year. The Upgrading of Land Tenure
Rights Amendment Act 6 of 2021 gives effect to a Constitutional Court judgment in
relation to permissions to occupy. The mismanagement of communal property
associations hampers this instrument to effect land reform, while the High Court limited
the powers of the Ingonyama Trust. The court had to interpret the interrelationship
between the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 and the Prevention of
Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998. Similarly, the
definition of ‘labour tenant’ was re-investigated. The interpretation of these Acts
remains an issue. The courts criticised land grabbing but protected the rights of the
vulnerable that were evicted during Covid-19 as well as living in the inner City of Cape
Town. In relation to housing, regulations, policies and strategies were published, while
the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform announced additional land reform
programmes.
The aim of this note is to highlight the most important land-related developments in the
course of 2021. In this article, the review process of section 25 of the Constitution, as
well as the Land Court Bill, restitution, matters linked to the Extension of Security of
Tenure Act 62 of 1997 (ESTA), unlawful occupation and eviction, housing, land
redistribution and other relevant land reform legislation, are discussed.
1
Review of Section 25 of the Constitution, the Property Clause
The Draft Constitution Eighteenth Amendment Bill
2
was published for comment in
December 2019, aimed at enabling the expropriation of land at nil compensation for
land reform purposes. Bogged down by the Covid-19 pandemic, the review process took
roughly three years, during which time various amendments to section 25 were put
forward. Apart from the obvious amendment to enable nil compensation in some
instances, further amendments included placing all land under state custodianship (the
1
The word limitation of the journal does not allow an exposition of all applicable 2021 case law. The
note will therefore focus on the discussion of a few notable cases only and provide references to
others.
2
GG 42902 (13 December 2019).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT