Land matters and rural development : 2014 (2) : journal

Record Numbersapr1_v29_n2_a19
Date01 January 2014
Pages573-607
DOI10.10520/EJC-7978f7616
Published date01 January 2014
In this note the most important literature, legislation and court decisions are discussed for the
1
period 2014-04-30 to 2014-10-15.
Land matters and rural development:
2014 (2)
1 General
In this note on land, the most important measures, court decisions and literature
pertaining to restitution, land redistribution, land reform, housing, land use
planning, deeds, sectional titles, agriculture and rural development are
discussed.1
2 Land restitution
The Annual Report of the Commission on Restitution of Land Rights 2013 – 2014,
entitled ‘Reversing the Legacy of the 1913 Native’s Land Act’
(http://www.pmg.org.za/report/20140702-land-reform-sector-budget-process-and-
audit-process-analysis-committee-staff-audit or-general-department-rural), states
that 77 610 claims were settled by 31 March 2014; 3.07m hectares were acquired
at R17b, and 1.8m restitution beneficiaries opted for financial compensation
(R8b); R4.1b was provided as development assistance to successful beneficiaries
who opted for land, bringing the total expenditure of the restitution programme to
R29.3b (Annual Report 5). During the Department’s reporting period 270 new
claims (47 rural and 223 urban) claims were settled, and 292 claims which were
previously settled were finalised (Annual Report 6). The 997 outstanding land
claims submitted prior to the initial closing date (31 December 1998) will be
prioritised in 2014 (Annual Report 7; 12). With the reopening of restitution (until
30 June 2019, as determined by the Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act
15 of 2014), a new electronic lodgement procedure (information in respect of
which will be accessible to the public), as well as fourteen lodgement sites and
nine provincial mobile lodgement units, have been established, and a
communication campaign is to be rolled out (Annual Report 7; see also Citizen’s
Manual: How to Lodge a Land Claim (30 July 2014)).
The Strategic Plan of the Commission on Restitution of Land Rights (CRLR)
2014–19, submitted to the Portfolio Commission on Rural Development and Land
Reform on 2 July 2014 (http://www.pmg.org.za/report/20140702-land-reform-
574 (2014) 29 SAPL
sector-budget-process-and-audit-process-analysis-committee-staff-auditor-
general-department-rural), indicates that the National Development Plan (NDP)
is the guiding framework, whilst sustainable land reform will be a priority also for
restitution initiatives.The strategy of the Commission for Restitution of Land
Rights (CRLR) has three foundations, namely (a) the restoration of land rights
with the view to supporting land reform and agrarian transformation; (b) enabling
the lodgement of claims for the restitution of land in cases where the 31
December 1998 cut-off date was not met; and (c) ‘organisational changed
management’. In terms of the Annual Performance Plan 2014/15 of the
Department of Rural Development a nd Land Re form (DRDLR)
(http://db3sqepoi5n3s.cloudfront.net/files/140702stratplan.pdf), the Minister
indicated that government is not ‘chasing statistics with regards to land restitution
anymore but quality. The four issues that we are concerned about are the
restitution, reform, development, and security of land tenure’ (Annual
Performance Plan 4). The emphasis will be on ensuring that all land reform farms
will be 100% productive, through the implementation of the Recapitalisation and
Development Progr amme (RADP). Inter-sect or and inter-sphere cooper ation and
collaboration will be facilitated, and the service delivery model will be adapted
(Annual Performance Plan 6).
Despite the positive reports and plans of the DRDLR, the South African
Human Rights Commission conducted an investigative hearing into land
restitution matters at the end of 2013 (SAHRC Report of the SAHRC:
Investigative hearing: Monitoring and investigating systemic challenges affecting
land restitution in South Africa (30 July 2014) 45-50). The main findings include
amongst others that there ‘are a significant number of problems’ associated with
the land restitution process that are not related to the Constitution or the legal
framework. The Commission indicated that the roles of the DRDLR and the CRLR
are not clearly defined. They also indicated that the CRLR indicated that one of
the factors that they take into account is that food production should not be
disrupted, but that this factor is not taken into account where mining is involved.
Other challenges include the valuation of land where the historical value of land
is taken into account and not the current value of the land (see also the
discussion of cases that deal with this matter under the Restitution Act). The loss
of mineral rights and the benefits that would have accrued to the community are
also not considered. The Commission raised their concern about the number of
claims outstanding as well as bureaucratic failure in determining the initial number
of claims lodged. It seems that the CRLR experienced capacity problems in doing
the necessary research to finalise the land claims and had to outsource this
function. The Commission stressed the need to expedite the CRLR’s access to
information in government archives and systems. It is also difficult to establish
what a ‘community’ is and who the persons would be that belong to such a
‘community’. The CRLR also has to take post-settlement issues and compen-
Land matters and rural development: 2014 (2) 575
sation into account which make their task even more difficult. It is stressed that
the CRLR will need additional resources to complete the existing land claims
before they would be able to embark on the new land claims process that is re-
opened. The SAHRC also raised concerns about the new land restitution process
and how it may influence existing land claimants (even the successful ones).
To illustrate the complications of the existing land claims, eight beneficiaries
of a group who received land in Sea Point want ‘to reverse its approval of the
R51m sale of their prime Sea Point land.’ The beneficiaries would have divided
the money of the sale amongst them but due to a dispute amongst the
beneficiaries it seems that the deal could be jeopardised (Legalbrief Today 11
November 2014).
2.1 Notices
Various notices were published in terms of the Restitution of Land Rights Act 22
of 1994 for land claims that are still not finalised as set out above (KwaZulu-Natal:
Umlazi and Umbumbulo 1 eac h, Camperdown 2; E astern Cape: Lady Gr ey,
Grahamstown, Stutterheim, Middelburg, Alice, Keiskammahoek, Cala and
Amathole 1 each, East London 7; King Williams Town 3; Stockenstrom 9; Umtata
2; Sterkspruit 10; Humansdorp 18; Western Cape: Vanrhynsdorp, Sandvlei
Macassar, Houtbay/Fish Hoek, Prince Albert, Grabouw, Clanwilliam, Grassy Park,
Kensington, Mossel Bay 1 each, Paarl and Cape Town 2 each, Retreat and
Goodwood 4 each; Limpopo: Sekhukhune, Waterberg, Mopane and Vhembe 1
each; Mpumalanga: Nkangala 9, Gert Sibande 7, Ehlanzeni 2; Northern Cape:
Holpan, Pixley Ka Seme, Gasegonyana, no district 1 each, ZF Mgcawa 2; Free
State: Brandfort 1; Gauteng/North-West: Ekurhuleni 1, Tshwane 2. A few
withdrawals (KwaZulu-Natal 3, Eastern Cape 11, Gauteng/North-West 1 and
Mpumalanga 3) and amendment notices (KwaZulu-Natal 9, Limpopo 5 and
Mpumalanga 12) were published.
Due to all the numerous claims in the Camperdown and Richmond areas in
KwaZulu-Natal and subsequent claims that arose from the amendment to the
Restitution Act two notices were published in the Government Gazette. GN 604
(in GG 37889 of 2014-08-08) stated that all claims in these areas should be
lodged before 14 November 2014 – several existing claims are also listed. GN
605 (in GG 37889 of 2014-08-08) urged claimants to in tervene in land claim
cases that deals with matters pertaining to claims in these two districts and that
are currently before the courts.
2.2 Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act 15 of 2014
The Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act 15 of 2014 (Restitution Act),
assented to on 29 June 2014, was published for general informa tion on 1 July
2014 (GN 526 in GG 37791 of 2014-07-01).The land claims process stands to be

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT