Labour standards and foreign direct investment: A perspective on the export-oriented garment sectors in selected sub-Saharan African countries

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation2018 Acta Juridica 183
Pages183-209
Published date19 December 2019
Date19 December 2019
183
Labour standards and foreign direct
investment: A perspective on the export-
oriented garment sectors in selected sub-
Saharan African countries
DEBBIE COLLIER* AND SHANE GODFREY
This essay considers the relationship between foreign direct investment
(FDI), labour markets and labour regulation. The essay discusses the
dierence between vertical (eciency-seeking) FDI and horizontal
(market-seeking) FDI, and the likely dynamics between these dierent
types of FDI and labour markets and labour relations. Lesotho and
Ethiopia are discussed as examples of how FDI interacts with labour
standards and labour market regulation in the context of sub-Saharan
Africa. The essay argues for policy orientation in developing countries
in Africa to attract a more benecial type of investment that balances the
interests of investors with those of the host country and its workforce.
The essay concludes with the observation that the development of
regional value chains in the context of the AfCTA should be pursued.
I INTRODUCTION
The relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI), labour
markets and labour regulation is complex and dynamic.1 While FDI,
particularly in manufacturing, can be an attractive and functional
means for developing countries to nance industrialisation, in turn
creating employment, promoting the transfer of skills and knowledge,
* BA LLB (Rhodes) LLM PhD (Cape Town); Attorney of the High Court,
Associate of the Institute of Development and Labour Law, Head of the Department
of Commercial Law, University of Cape Town.
B Proc (Unisa) BA Hons MA PhD (Cape Town); Co-ordinator of the
Labour and Enterprise Policy Research Group, Department of Commercial Law,
University of Cape Town.
1 This is further compounded by the social disruption caused by the current
technological revolution. On the likely challenges for the sub-Saharan region, see
R Samans & S Zahidi ‘The future of jobs and skills in Africa: Preparing the region
for the Fourth Industrial Revolution’, available at http://www3.weforum.org/
docs/WEF_EGW_FOJ_Africa.pdf (accessed on 4 September 2019).
2018 Acta Juridica 183
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
184 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND THE LAW
and spurring economic growth,2 it is not a homogeneous activity
with predictable consequences for the labour market. The nature
of the FDI is likely to relate to, or impact on, labour standards and
labour market institutions dierently.3
In this regard, the literature on FDI dierentiates between various
types of FDI, most notably between vertical (eciency-seeking) FDI
and horizontal (market-seeking) FDI.4 In the latter type, foreign
rms largely reproduce their activities – producing the same goods
or services – within the host country (or multiple host countries)
for supply to the domestic market of the host country.5 Vertical FDI,
on the other hand, involves the fragmentation and relocation of
production, or an aspect of production, to the host country, by a
multinational rm.6
Vertical FDI, which is attractive to industrialising countries
seeking to grow their manufacturing base,7 occurs when rms
relocate activities, either ‘upstream’ or ‘downstream’,8 in order to
2 FDI can also be oppor tunistic and dysfunctional, motivated by short-term
economic interests to the detriment of the greater public interest and sustainable
development.
3 See, eg, L Jaeck & S Kim ‘FDI deregulation versus labor market reform:
A political economy approach’ (2018) 45 Atl Econ J 73 89; and D Kucera
‘Core labour standards and foreign direct investment’ (2002) 141 International
Labour R 1 2.
4 In addition to Jaeck & Kim (n 3) and Kucera (n 3), see S Beugelsdijk,
R Smeets & R Zwinkels ‘The impact of horizontal and vertical FDI on host’s
country economic growth’ (2008) 17 International Business R 452 72.
5 Hor izontal FDI occurs predominantly, but not exclusively, in developed
countries. A good example of horizontal FDI are the global investments of the
German company, Volkswagen Aktiengessellschaft (VW), which invests in the
production and sale of its vehicles in multiple host countries, including South Africa.
6 The fragmentation of production means that the dierent stages of production
are separated, with each stage being undertaken by a dierent supplier, with the
possibility that dierent stages are undertaken in dierent countries. In the case
of global value chains, a dominant rm usually coordinates the dierent suppliers.
7 In this regard, the importance of global trade in textiles and apparel, and the
central role of the sector for industrialising countries, should not be underestimated.
See, eg, M Morris, J Barnes & M Kao Global Value Chains, Sustainable Development,
and the Apparel Industry in Lesotho (2016) and R Appelbaum ‘Assessing the impact
of the phasing-out of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing on apparel
exports on the least developing and developing countries’ (May 2004) Centre for
Global Studies.
8 The activity is either upstream or downstream depending on whether it
occurs earlier on in the value chain (upstream) or at a later stage (downstream) in
the value chain.
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT